-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8315923: pretouch_memory by atomic-add-0 fragments huge pages unexpectedly #825
Conversation
…tedly Reviewed-by: jsjolen, stuefe
…ected a higher ratio between stack committed and reserved 8325218: gc/parallel/TestAlwaysPreTouchBehavior.java fails Reviewed-by: stefank, jsjolen, stuefe
👋 Welcome back lliu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@limingliu-ampere This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 11 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@shipilev) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have questions:
- If JDK-8324781 is included, you need to say
/issue add JDK-8324781
, and later request approval for it as well. - Looking at issue links, what about JDK-8325218?
/issue add JDK-8324781 JDK-8325218 |
@limingliu-ampere Adding additional issue to issue list: |
Hi @shipilev! Thank you for your suggestions. The root case of JDK-8324781 and JDK-8325218 are the same, so they were solved in the same commit. I added them altogether. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All right, this makes sense, thanks!
|
/approval 8315923 request |
@limingliu-ampere |
/approval 8324781 request |
/approval 8325218 request |
@limingliu-ampere |
@limingliu-ampere |
/integrate |
@limingliu-ampere |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit cb40bc2.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@shipilev @limingliu-ampere Pushed as commit cb40bc2. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This pull request ports JDK-8315923 back to JDK-21, as JDK-21 still uses atomic-add-0 to pretouch memory and results fragmented huge pages. This backport has the following differences from its original version:
Progress
Issues
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/825/head:pull/825
$ git checkout pull/825
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/825
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/825/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 825
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 825
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/825.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment