Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8326332: Unclosed inline tags cause misalignment in summary tables #866

Closed

Conversation

MBaesken
Copy link
Member

@MBaesken MBaesken commented Jul 23, 2024

Backport of 8326332


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8326332 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8326332: Unclosed inline tags cause misalignment in summary tables (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/866/head:pull/866
$ git checkout pull/866

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/866
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/866/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 866

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 866

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/866.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 23, 2024

👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 23, 2024

@MBaesken This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8326332: Unclosed inline tags cause misalignment in summary tables

Reviewed-by: rschmelter

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • bba56e0: 8333361: ubsan,test : libHeapMonitorTest.cpp:518:9: runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 2, which is declared to never be null
  • 4cab9a4: 8334769: Shenandoah: Move CodeCache_lock close to its use in ShenandoahConcurrentNMethodIterator
  • 570a6bd: 8310628: GcInfoBuilder.c missing JNI Exception checks
  • e2254eb: 8316131: runtime/cds/appcds/TestParallelGCWithCDS.java fails with JNI error
  • 928219d: 8334339: Test java/nio/file/attribute/BasicFileAttributeView/CreationTime.java fails on alinux3

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport a6dc4bc2b83c7240e573ac43f9b7a10191c58ed3 8326332: Unclosed inline tags cause misalignment in summary tables Jul 23, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 23, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 23, 2024

⚠️ @MBaesken This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 23, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 23, 2024

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the clean label Jul 24, 2024
@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

replace jdk21 List getLast() / removeLast() methods , to be able to build with a Boot JDK 20; use the default method implementation of List, this should be okay here.

@RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor

I think you can remove the .isEmpty() check because in all places this is checked before calling getLast()/removeLast(). Maybe you want to just inline the code for a populated list in place?

@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

MBaesken commented Jul 24, 2024

I removed the isEmpty() check . But probably the performance gain is not very big (otherwise the jdk head coding should be revised).

Copy link
Contributor

@schmelter-sap schmelter-sap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good so far.

@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

I made the helpers as suggested 'private static' .

Copy link
Contributor

@schmelter-sap schmelter-sap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good now.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Jul 25, 2024
@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 26, 2024

Going to push as commit cc85abc.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • bba56e0: 8333361: ubsan,test : libHeapMonitorTest.cpp:518:9: runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 2, which is declared to never be null
  • 4cab9a4: 8334769: Shenandoah: Move CodeCache_lock close to its use in ShenandoahConcurrentNMethodIterator
  • 570a6bd: 8310628: GcInfoBuilder.c missing JNI Exception checks
  • e2254eb: 8316131: runtime/cds/appcds/TestParallelGCWithCDS.java fails with JNI error
  • 928219d: 8334339: Test java/nio/file/attribute/BasicFileAttributeView/CreationTime.java fails on alinux3

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 26, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 26, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 26, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 26, 2024

@MBaesken Pushed as commit cc85abc.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants