Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8315751: RandomTestBsi1999 fails often with timeouts on Linux ppc64le #143

Closed

Conversation

MBaesken
Copy link
Member

@MBaesken MBaesken commented Sep 8, 2023


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8315751 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8315751: RandomTestBsi1999 fails often with timeouts on Linux ppc64le (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u.git pull/143/head:pull/143
$ git checkout pull/143

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/143
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u.git pull/143/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 143

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 143

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/143.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 8, 2023

👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 9887cd8adc408a71b045b1a4891cc0d5dede7e0e 8315751: RandomTestBsi1999 fails often with timeouts on Linux ppc64le Sep 8, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 8, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 8, 2023

⚠️ @MBaesken This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 8, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 8, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Sep 12, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 13, 2023

@MBaesken This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8315751: RandomTestBsi1999 fails often with timeouts on Linux ppc64le

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 13 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • f6426fa: 8314094: java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fails on Windows when run as user with Administrator privileges
  • 9b983f3: 8314935: Shenandoah: Unable to throw OOME on back-to-back Full GCs
  • 1dac78c: 8315735: VerifyError when switch statement used with synchronized block
  • 27f635f: 8311630: [s390] Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Preview)
  • acf28f4: 8311631: When multiple users run tools/jpackage/share/LicenseTest.java, Permission denied for writing /var/tmp/*.files
  • 292ac0f: 8311938: Add default cups include location for configure on AIX
  • d99b62b: 8312466: /bin/nm usage in AIX makes needs -X64 flag
  • 2d8be5c: 8315214: Do not run sun/tools/jhsdb tests concurrently
  • 82bb82a: 8311585: Add JRadioButtonMenuItem to bug8031573.java
  • 8565c71: 8315863: [GHA] Update checkout action to use v4
  • ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/compare/8477ff8570db63c86034986230d983c0ed308567...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Sep 13, 2023
@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 13, 2023

Going to push as commit 0294541.
Since your change was applied there have been 15 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3eaecb0: 8313873: java/nio/channels/DatagramChannel/SendReceiveMaxSize.java fails on AIX due to small default RCVBUF size and different IPv6 Header interpretation
  • efd090a: 8313792: Verify 4th party information in src/jdk.internal.le/share/legal/jline.md
  • f6426fa: 8314094: java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fails on Windows when run as user with Administrator privileges
  • 9b983f3: 8314935: Shenandoah: Unable to throw OOME on back-to-back Full GCs
  • 1dac78c: 8315735: VerifyError when switch statement used with synchronized block
  • 27f635f: 8311630: [s390] Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Preview)
  • acf28f4: 8311631: When multiple users run tools/jpackage/share/LicenseTest.java, Permission denied for writing /var/tmp/*.files
  • 292ac0f: 8311938: Add default cups include location for configure on AIX
  • d99b62b: 8312466: /bin/nm usage in AIX makes needs -X64 flag
  • 2d8be5c: 8315214: Do not run sun/tools/jhsdb tests concurrently
  • ... and 5 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/compare/8477ff8570db63c86034986230d983c0ed308567...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 13, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 13, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 13, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 13, 2023

@MBaesken Pushed as commit 0294541.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
1 participant