Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8232839: JDI AfterThreadDeathTest.java failed due to "FAILED: Did not get expected IllegalThreadStateException on a StepRequest.enable()" #229

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Oct 6, 2023

I backport this for parity with 17.0.10-oracle.
Should go to 21, too.


Progress

  • JDK-8232839 needs maintainer approval
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8232839: JDI AfterThreadDeathTest.java failed due to "FAILED: Did not get expected IllegalThreadStateException on a StepRequest.enable()" (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u.git pull/229/head:pull/229
$ git checkout pull/229

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/229
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u.git pull/229/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 229

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 229

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/229.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 6, 2023

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 84184f947342fd1adbe4e3f2230ce3de4ae6007e 8232839: JDI AfterThreadDeathTest.java failed due to "FAILED: Did not get expected IllegalThreadStateException on a StepRequest.enable()" Oct 6, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 6, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 6, 2023

⚠️ @GoeLin This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 6, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 6, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 10, 2023

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8232839: JDI AfterThreadDeathTest.java failed due to "FAILED: Did not get expected IllegalThreadStateException on a StepRequest.enable()"

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • edc15aa: 8313368: (fc) FileChannel.size returns 0 on block special files
  • e22d333: 8314120: Add tests for FileDescriptor.sync
  • 1bcaff3: 8316130: Incorrect control in LibraryCallKit::inline_native_notify_jvmti_funcs
  • f2cb058: 8316337: (bf) Concurrency issue in DirectByteBuffer.Deallocator
  • cbde98c: 8316179: Use consistent naming for lightweight locking in MacroAssembler
  • 7e1755d: 8315942: Sort platform enums and definitions after JDK-8304913 follow-ups

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Oct 10, 2023
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Oct 10, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 10, 2023

Going to push as commit ac6d84c.
Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • edc15aa: 8313368: (fc) FileChannel.size returns 0 on block special files
  • e22d333: 8314120: Add tests for FileDescriptor.sync
  • 1bcaff3: 8316130: Incorrect control in LibraryCallKit::inline_native_notify_jvmti_funcs
  • f2cb058: 8316337: (bf) Concurrency issue in DirectByteBuffer.Deallocator
  • cbde98c: 8316179: Use consistent naming for lightweight locking in MacroAssembler
  • 7e1755d: 8315942: Sort platform enums and definitions after JDK-8304913 follow-ups

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 10, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 10, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 10, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 10, 2023

@GoeLin Pushed as commit ac6d84c.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant