Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8317262: LockStack::contains(oop) fails "assert(t->is_Java_thread()) failed: incorrect cast to JavaThread" #262

Closed

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Oct 17, 2023

Clean backport to fix the trivial bug in new light-weight locking. This code path is disabled by default in JDK 21u, but the bug would manifest if any user experimentally enables it.

Additional testing:

  • New regression test fails without the patch, passes with it (needs explicit -XX:LockingMode=2 to reproduce)

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • JDK-8317262 needs maintainer approval
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8317262: LockStack::contains(oop) fails "assert(t->is_Java_thread()) failed: incorrect cast to JavaThread" (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u.git pull/262/head:pull/262
$ git checkout pull/262

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/262
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u.git pull/262/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 262

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 262

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/262.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 17, 2023

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 4ea1b99c1a6efe144af381ea538f93718e9baf74 8317262: LockStack::contains(oop) fails "assert(t->is_Java_thread()) failed: incorrect cast to JavaThread" Oct 17, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 17, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 17, 2023

⚠️ @shipilev This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 17, 2023
@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

/approval request Clean backport to fix the trivial bug in new light-weight locking. This code path is disabled by default in JDK 21u, but the bug would manifest if any user experimentally enables it.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 17, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 17, 2023

@shipilev
8317262: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Oct 17, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 19, 2023

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8317262: LockStack::contains(oop) fails "assert(t->is_Java_thread()) failed: incorrect cast to JavaThread"

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 18 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Oct 19, 2023
@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 19, 2023

Going to push as commit 94bb191.
Since your change was applied there have been 21 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 19, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 19, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 19, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 19, 2023

@shipilev Pushed as commit 94bb191.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@shipilev shipilev deleted the JDK-8317262-lockstack-assert branch October 19, 2023 18:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant