Skip to content

8352097: (tz) zone.tab update missed in 2025a backport #460

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

gnu-andrew
Copy link
Member

@gnu-andrew gnu-andrew commented Mar 15, 2025

The 21u backport of the tzdata 2025a update missed an update to zone.tab, as this was not present in the 25u commit on which it was based, due to its removal in JDK-8166983. The change was in the 24u commit which was applied later than the 21u one.

We should add this missing change to the existing 2025a update in 21.0.7 and consider backporting JDK-8166983 for 21.0.8.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8352097 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8352097: (tz) zone.tab update missed in 2025a backport (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u.git pull/460/head:pull/460
$ git checkout pull/460

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/460
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u.git pull/460/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 460

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 460

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/460.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 15, 2025

👋 Welcome back andrew! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 15, 2025

@gnu-andrew This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8352097: (tz) zone.tab update missed in 2025a backport

Reviewed-by: serb, dcherepanov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 15, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 15, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 15, 2025

⚠️ @gnu-andrew This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor

jerboaa commented Mar 17, 2025

Could we establish whether or not this omission is something we need to fix first? Sorry for the ignorance, but it appears to be some file being used only for generating javadoc in test code?

@gnu-andrew
Copy link
Member Author

gnu-andrew commented Mar 18, 2025

Could we establish whether or not this omission is something we need to fix first? Sorry for the ignorance, but it appears to be some file being used only for generating javadoc in test code?

I tend to agree that the file is mostly unused, but I don't think that a regression fix a week away from development freeze is the right place to be doing the removal. It seems safer to fix this missed change in the upcoming releases (putting us back in sync with 24.0.1) and attempt to remove it across all update releases (24u first) for July (that's what JDK-8166983 is; sorry if I didn't make this explicit).

Equally, I would rather not leave an out-of-sync file in the upcoming releases for the sake of a one-line patch.

@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor

jerboaa commented Mar 18, 2025

/approve yes

Fair enough. This is low risk anyway.

@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor

jerboaa commented Mar 18, 2025

Please apply for approval.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 18, 2025

@jerboaa
8352097: There is no maintainer approval request for this issue.

@gnu-andrew
Copy link
Member Author

/approval request Follow-up fix to the tzdata 2025a backport to include a change to a file no longer present in OpenJDK 25, but patched in OpenJDK 24. Tests on java/text/Format, java/util/TimeZone, sun/util/calendar, sun/util/resources & java/time all pass.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 18, 2025

@gnu-andrew
8352097: The approval request has been created successfully.

@gnu-andrew
Copy link
Member Author

Please apply for approval.

Yes, I was in the process of doing so and realised I never ran the tests. Done now:

==============================
Test summary
==============================
   TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
   jtreg:test/jdk/java/text/Format                     112   112     0     0   
   jtreg:test/jdk/java/util/TimeZone                    26    26     0     0   
   jtreg:test/jdk/sun/util/calendar                      5     5     0     0   
   jtreg:test/jdk/sun/util/resources                    22    22     0     0   
   jtreg:test/jdk/java/time                            188   188     0     0   
==============================
TEST SUCCESS

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Mar 18, 2025
@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor

jerboaa commented Mar 19, 2025

/approve yes

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 19, 2025

@jerboaa
8352097: The approval request has been approved.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Mar 19, 2025
@gnu-andrew
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 19, 2025

Going to push as commit 4d3a3c0.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 19, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 19, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 19, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 19, 2025

@gnu-andrew Pushed as commit 4d3a3c0.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants