8325590: Regression in round-tripping UTF-16 strings after JDK-8311906

[RogerRiggs]

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8325590: Regression in round-tripping UTF-16 strings after JDK-8311906 (Bug - P1)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22.git pull/110/head:pull/110
$ git checkout pull/110

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/110
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22.git pull/110/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 110

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 110

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22/pull/110.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back rriggs! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

@RogerRiggs The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs
• nio

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (80d8e2e8)

[openjdk]

@RogerRiggs This change is no longer ready for integration - check the PR body for details.

[AlanBateman]

This is for jdk22u, not jdk22

[AlanBateman]

This is for jdk22u, not jdk22

[kevinrushforth]

@RogerRiggs Since this is deferred out of JDK 22, you need to close this PR and open a new one against jdk22u.

[kevinrushforth]

@AlanBateman You might want to unapprove this PR (go to "Files" and submit a review with "Request Changes")

UPDATE: I see you already did.

[RogerRiggs]

The backport was intended to be for jdk22u