8320275: assert(_chunk->bitmap().at(index)) failed: Bit not set at index

[pchilano]

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit e9e694f4 from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Patricio Chilano Mateo on 2 Jan 2024 and was reviewed by Dean Long and Frederic Parain.

Thanks!

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8320275: assert(_chunk->bitmap().at(index)) failed: Bit not set at index (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

• David Holmes (@dholmes-ora - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22.git pull/29/head:pull/29
$ git checkout pull/29

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/29
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22.git pull/29/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 29

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 29

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22/pull/29.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back pchilanomate! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

@pchilano The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (84aeac51)

[openjdk]

@pchilano This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8320275: assert(_chunk->bitmap().at(index)) failed: Bit not set at index

Reviewed-by: dholmes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• a6e3565: 8321515: ARM32: Move method resolution information out of the cpCache properly
• a72afb3: 8322647: Short name for the Europe/Lisbon time zone is incorrect

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[pchilano]

Thanks David!

[pchilano]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 01cb043.
Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

• bb0e203: 8321582: yield .class not parsed correctly.
• b121931: 8322214: Return value of XMLInputFactory.getProperty() changed from boolean to String in JDK 22 early access builds
• a6e3565: 8321515: ARM32: Move method resolution information out of the cpCache properly
• a72afb3: 8322647: Short name for the Europe/Lisbon time zone is incorrect

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@pchilano Pushed as commit 01cb043.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.