Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 17, 2024. It is now read-only.
/ jdk22u Public archive

8329570: G1: Excessive is_obj_dead_cond calls in verification #132

Closed

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Apr 8, 2024

Simple fastdebug performance improvement fix. Risk is low, as it only moves the assert to an earlier stage.

Additional testing:

  • GHA

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8329570 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8329570: G1: Excessive is_obj_dead_cond calls in verification (Enhancement - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22u.git pull/132/head:pull/132
$ git checkout pull/132

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/132
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22u.git pull/132/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 132

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 132

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22u/pull/132.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 8, 2024

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 8, 2024

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8329570: G1: Excessive is_obj_dead_cond calls in verification

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 13 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 5968567: 8324632: Update Zlib Data Compression Library to Version 1.3.1
  • ae466e2: 8323801: tag doesn't strikethrough the text
  • c45dbbc: 8327631: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2024-03-07
  • 11adb6e: 8329656: assertion failed in MAP_ARCHIVE_MMAP_FAILURE path: Invalid immediate -5 0
  • 3d99b8f: 8309218: java/util/concurrent/locks/Lock/OOMEInAQS.java still times out with ZGC, Generational ZGC, and SerialGC
  • 64b4949: 8328316: Finisher cannot emit if stream is sequential and integrator returned false
  • bcf0d25: 8329823: RISC-V: Need to sync CPU features with related JVM flags
  • dbaca7a: 8325028: (ch) Pipe channels should lazily set socket to non-blocking mode on first use by virtual thread
  • 3b35164: 8329545: [s390x] Fix garbage value being passed in Argument Register
  • 817cf13: 8328702: C2: Crash during parsing because sub type check is not folded
  • ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22u/compare/92d6fa4abec1fdf8e57723e4490be0ba4f97e59d...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 29992e1fca4faef0fe0ac453c7e78db4628d5e70 8329570: G1: Excessive is_obj_dead_cond calls in verification Apr 8, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 8, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 8, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 8, 2024

Webrevs

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

shipilev commented Apr 8, 2024

This is actually a clean backport. Weird that bots are not marking it as such.

/clean

@openjdk openjdk bot added the clean label Apr 8, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 8, 2024

@shipilev This backport pull request is now marked as clean

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

shipilev commented Apr 8, 2024

/approval request Simple fastdebug performance improvement fix. GHA tests pass. Risk is low, as it only moves the assert to an earlier stage.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 8, 2024

⚠️ @shipilev This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 8, 2024

@shipilev
8329570: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Apr 8, 2024
@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Going to push as commit 52915be.
Since your change was applied there have been 13 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 5968567: 8324632: Update Zlib Data Compression Library to Version 1.3.1
  • ae466e2: 8323801: tag doesn't strikethrough the text
  • c45dbbc: 8327631: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2024-03-07
  • 11adb6e: 8329656: assertion failed in MAP_ARCHIVE_MMAP_FAILURE path: Invalid immediate -5 0
  • 3d99b8f: 8309218: java/util/concurrent/locks/Lock/OOMEInAQS.java still times out with ZGC, Generational ZGC, and SerialGC
  • 64b4949: 8328316: Finisher cannot emit if stream is sequential and integrator returned false
  • bcf0d25: 8329823: RISC-V: Need to sync CPU features with related JVM flags
  • dbaca7a: 8325028: (ch) Pipe channels should lazily set socket to non-blocking mode on first use by virtual thread
  • 3b35164: 8329545: [s390x] Fix garbage value being passed in Argument Register
  • 817cf13: 8328702: C2: Crash during parsing because sub type check is not folded
  • ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22u/compare/92d6fa4abec1fdf8e57723e4490be0ba4f97e59d...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 17, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 17, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 17, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 17, 2024

@shipilev Pushed as commit 52915be.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant