-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
8329528: G1 does not update TAMS correctly when dropping retained regions during Concurrent Start pause #145
Conversation
👋 Welcome back tschatzl! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@tschatzl This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 30 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
Thanks @albertnetymk @ChrisHegarty for your reviews. Now applying for push approval. |
Mailing list message from Chris Hegarty on jdk-updates-dev: Thanks for backporting this Thomas. Given the severe nature of this bug and its impact, it renders JDK 22 I would like to propose a 22.0.1.1 be considered to get this fix into -Chris. On 17/04/2024 10:59, Chris Hegarty wrote: |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit ac9ca97.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Hi all,
please review this backport for https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329528; it applies cleanly apart from the hunk now in
inline void HeapRegion::note_start_of_marking()
- in jdk23 this method moved from there to concurrent marking code, although the change itself is the same.This issue causes random crashes in G1. There is no workaround.
The change baked in jdk23 for a week or so, with no issues. Risk is little at this point as the patch is small and well understood, and there is a regression test.
Testing: gha, tier1-5
Progress
Issue
Backport <hash>
with the hash of the original commit. See Backports.Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22u.git pull/145/head:pull/145
$ git checkout pull/145
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/145
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22u.git pull/145/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 145
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 145
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22u/pull/145.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment