Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 17, 2024. It is now read-only.
/ jdk22u Public archive

8295111: dpkg appears to have problems resolving symbolically linked native libraries #156

Conversation

alexeysemenyukoracle
Copy link
Member

@alexeysemenyukoracle alexeysemenyukoracle commented Apr 19, 2024


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8295111 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8295111: dpkg appears to have problems resolving symbolically linked native libraries (Bug - P2 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22u.git pull/156/head:pull/156
$ git checkout pull/156

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/156
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22u.git pull/156/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 156

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 156

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22u/pull/156.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 19, 2024

👋 Welcome back asemenyuk! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 19, 2024

@alexeysemenyukoracle This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8295111: dpkg appears to have problems resolving symbolically linked native libraries

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • bf8146e: 8328744: Parallel: Parallel GC throws OOM before heap is fully expanded
  • bde0fad: 8330011: [s390x] update block-comments to make code consistent
  • 52b43e9: 8324874: AArch64: crypto pmull based CRC32/CRC32C intrinsics clobber V8-V15 registers
  • 5f333b5: 8326106: Write and clear stack trace table outside of safepoint
  • ccb1a3e: 8324933: ConcurrentHashTable::statistics_calculate synchronization is expensive
  • ac9ca97: 8329528: G1 does not update TAMS correctly when dropping retained regions during Concurrent Start pause

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 32946e1882e9b22c983cbba3c6bda3cc7295946a 8295111: dpkg appears to have problems resolving symbolically linked native libraries Apr 19, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 19, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 19, 2024

⚠️ @alexeysemenyukoracle This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 19, 2024
@alexeysemenyukoracle
Copy link
Member Author

/approval request

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 19, 2024

@alexeysemenyukoracle
8295111: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Apr 19, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 19, 2024

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Apr 21, 2024
@alexeysemenyukoracle
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Apr 22, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 22, 2024

@alexeysemenyukoracle
Your change (at version 450f5a0) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 23, 2024

Going to push as commit a93848c.
Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • bf8146e: 8328744: Parallel: Parallel GC throws OOM before heap is fully expanded
  • bde0fad: 8330011: [s390x] update block-comments to make code consistent
  • 52b43e9: 8324874: AArch64: crypto pmull based CRC32/CRC32C intrinsics clobber V8-V15 registers
  • 5f333b5: 8326106: Write and clear stack trace table outside of safepoint
  • ccb1a3e: 8324933: ConcurrentHashTable::statistics_calculate synchronization is expensive
  • ac9ca97: 8329528: G1 does not update TAMS correctly when dropping retained regions during Concurrent Start pause

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 23, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 23, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Apr 23, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 23, 2024

@shipilev @alexeysemenyukoracle Pushed as commit a93848c.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants