Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8321509: False positive in get_trampoline fast path causes crash #36

Closed

Conversation

lutkerd
Copy link

@lutkerd lutkerd commented Jul 25, 2024


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8321509 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8321509: False positive in get_trampoline fast path causes crash (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk23u.git pull/36/head:pull/36
$ git checkout pull/36

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/36
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk23u.git pull/36/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 36

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 36

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk23u/pull/36.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 25, 2024

👋 Welcome back dlutker! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2024

@lutkerd This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8321509: False positive in get_trampoline fast path causes crash

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 46 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c40246c: 8336692: Redo fix for JDK-8284620
  • 950de65: 8335904: Fix invalid comment in ShenandoahLock
  • d07767c: 8334482: Shenandoah: Deadlock when safepoint is pending during nmethods iteration
  • a523870: 8335237: ubsan: vtableStubs.hpp is_vtable_stub exclude from ubsan checks
  • 9704054: 8334564: VM startup: fatal error: FLAG_SET_ERGO cannot be used to set an invalid value for NonNMethodCodeHeapSize
  • 91d6d15: 8333363: ubsan: instanceKlass.cpp: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct AnnotationArray'
  • 1db2bb0: 8332699: ubsan: jfrEventSetting.inline.hpp:31:43: runtime error: index 163 out of bounds for type 'jfrNativeEventSetting [162]'
  • b5df571: Merge
  • 2288c05: 8334339: Test java/nio/file/attribute/BasicFileAttributeView/CreationTime.java fails on alinux3
  • 5473e9e: 8325280: Update troff manpages in JDK 23 before RC
  • ... and 36 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk23u/compare/6ad484a475a5291034558864ab6f5611a90c825a...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 73e3e0edeb20c6f701b213423476f92fb05dd262 8321509: False positive in get_trampoline fast path causes crash Jul 25, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@lutkerd lutkerd marked this pull request as ready for review July 25, 2024 18:19
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2024

⚠️ @lutkerd This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 25, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 25, 2024

Webrevs

@lutkerd
Copy link
Author

lutkerd commented Jul 25, 2024

/approval request Backporting at jdk21u maintainer request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2024

@lutkerd
8321509: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Jul 25, 2024
@lutkerd
Copy link
Author

lutkerd commented Jul 31, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jul 31, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 31, 2024

@lutkerd
Your change (at version 1d43023) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@benty-amzn
Copy link

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 31, 2024

Going to push as commit cfbc041.
Since your change was applied there have been 46 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c40246c: 8336692: Redo fix for JDK-8284620
  • 950de65: 8335904: Fix invalid comment in ShenandoahLock
  • d07767c: 8334482: Shenandoah: Deadlock when safepoint is pending during nmethods iteration
  • a523870: 8335237: ubsan: vtableStubs.hpp is_vtable_stub exclude from ubsan checks
  • 9704054: 8334564: VM startup: fatal error: FLAG_SET_ERGO cannot be used to set an invalid value for NonNMethodCodeHeapSize
  • 91d6d15: 8333363: ubsan: instanceKlass.cpp: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct AnnotationArray'
  • 1db2bb0: 8332699: ubsan: jfrEventSetting.inline.hpp:31:43: runtime error: index 163 out of bounds for type 'jfrNativeEventSetting [162]'
  • b5df571: Merge
  • 2288c05: 8334339: Test java/nio/file/attribute/BasicFileAttributeView/CreationTime.java fails on alinux3
  • 5473e9e: 8325280: Update troff manpages in JDK 23 before RC
  • ... and 36 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk23u/compare/6ad484a475a5291034558864ab6f5611a90c825a...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 31, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 31, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Jul 31, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 31, 2024

@benty-amzn @lutkerd Pushed as commit cfbc041.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants