Skip to content

8351933: Inaccurate masking of TC subfield decrement in ForkJoinPool #148

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dchuyko
Copy link
Member

@dchuyko dchuyko commented Mar 19, 2025

This is a clean backport of a tiny ForkJoinPool change that corrects the TC subfield masking.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8351933 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8351933: Inaccurate masking of TC subfield decrement in ForkJoinPool (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk24u.git pull/148/head:pull/148
$ git checkout pull/148

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/148
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk24u.git pull/148/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 148

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 148

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk24u/pull/148.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 19, 2025

👋 Welcome back dchuyko! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 19, 2025

@dchuyko This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8351933: Inaccurate masking of TC subfield decrement in ForkJoinPool

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9d41ba1: 8348261: assert(n->is_Mem()) failed: memory node required
  • 77d8da6: 8347995: Race condition in jdk/java/net/httpclient/offline/FixedResponseHttpClient.java
  • 96da000: 8347286: (fs) Remove some extensions from java/nio/file/Files/probeContentType/Basic.java

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport fed34e46b89bc9b0462d9b5f5e5ab5516fe18c6e 8351933: Inaccurate masking of TC subfield decrement in ForkJoinPool Mar 19, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 19, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 19, 2025

⚠️ @dchuyko This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 19, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 19, 2025

Webrevs

@dchuyko
Copy link
Member Author

dchuyko commented Mar 19, 2025

/approval request This a tiny bugfix in ForkJoinPool. At one of code paths the TC subfield of ctl field is decremented and the result is not masked correctly, so the RC subfield is not preserved. In older releases that sometimes leads to a stopped pool, but in 24u it's still a bug. The fix from 25 is applied cleanly.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 19, 2025

@dchuyko
8351933: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Mar 19, 2025
@dchuyko dchuyko closed this Mar 19, 2025
@dchuyko dchuyko deleted the JDK-8351933 branch March 19, 2025 13:40
@dchuyko dchuyko restored the JDK-8351933 branch March 19, 2025 13:40
@dchuyko dchuyko reopened this Mar 19, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Mar 21, 2025
@dchuyko
Copy link
Member Author

dchuyko commented Mar 21, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Mar 21, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 21, 2025

@dchuyko
Your change (at version 07d8df8) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Going to push as commit 48f11a4.
Since your change was applied there have been 8 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4b46d73: 8348598: Update Libpng to 1.6.47
  • 7b0a0ba: 8349378: Build splashscreen lib with SIZE optimization
  • 512cdb2: 8350683: Non-C2 / minimal JVM crashes in the build on ppc64 platforms
  • 7dd8681: 8351382: New test containers/docker/TestMemoryWithSubgroups.java is failing
  • 9880a97: 8352302: Test sun/security/tools/jarsigner/TimestampCheck.java is failing
  • 9d41ba1: 8348261: assert(n->is_Mem()) failed: memory node required
  • 77d8da6: 8347995: Race condition in jdk/java/net/httpclient/offline/FixedResponseHttpClient.java
  • 96da000: 8347286: (fs) Remove some extensions from java/nio/file/Files/probeContentType/Basic.java

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Mar 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 24, 2025

@phohensee @dchuyko Pushed as commit 48f11a4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants