8369184: SimpleTimeZone equals() Returns True for Unequal Instances with Different hashCode Values

[kieran-farrell]

Clean backport

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• JDK-8369184 needs maintainer approval

Issue

• JDK-8369184: SimpleTimeZone equals() Returns True for Unequal Instances with Different hashCode Values (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u.git pull/297/head:pull/297
$ git checkout pull/297

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/297
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u.git pull/297/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 297

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 297

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/pull/297.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back kfarrell! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@kieran-farrell This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8369184: SimpleTimeZone equals() Returns True for Unequal Instances with Different hashCode Values

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 379 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• b8aa130: 8366159: SkippedException is treated as a pass for pkcs11/KeyStore, pkcs11/SecretKeyFactory and pkcs11/SecureRandom
• a875f32: 8367133: DTLS: fragmentation of Finished message results in handshake failure
• 368e829: 8367384: The ICC_Profile class may throw exceptions during serialization
• ... and 376 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/compare/bff98e7d4d0269cbd71beccacaaf2acf990a0aca...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

⚠️ @kieran-farrell This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (8f1fcfd1)

[kieran-farrell]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@kieran-farrell
Your change (at version 8f1fcfd) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[naotoj]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 28eaab4.
Since your change was applied there have been 379 commits pushed to the master branch:

• b8aa130: 8366159: SkippedException is treated as a pass for pkcs11/KeyStore, pkcs11/SecretKeyFactory and pkcs11/SecureRandom
• a875f32: 8367133: DTLS: fragmentation of Finished message results in handshake failure
• 368e829: 8367384: The ICC_Profile class may throw exceptions during serialization
• ... and 376 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u/compare/bff98e7d4d0269cbd71beccacaaf2acf990a0aca...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@naotoj @kieran-farrell Pushed as commit 28eaab4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.