-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8245543: Cgroups: Incorrect detection logic on some systems (still reproducible) #159
Conversation
👋 Welcome back jdowland! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tests will need adjustment for this one.
hotspot/test/runtime/containers/cgroup/CgroupSubsystemFactory.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jdk/test/jdk/internal/platform/cgroup/TestCgroupSubsystemFactory.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jdk/test/jdk/internal/platform/cgroup/TestCgroupSubsystemFactory.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
95e430e
to
00dc64a
Compare
@jmtd For some reason this patch now looks weird and would need fixing before I can review. Thanks. |
9c008bc
to
4eb0b00
Compare
@jmtd Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. All changes will be squashed into a single commit automatically when integrating. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
2892336
to
0b56b96
Compare
@jmtd Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. All changes will be squashed into a single commit automatically when integrating. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good now.
0b56b96
to
e4e9311
Compare
00dc64a
to
4ea4662
Compare
@jmtd Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. All changes will be squashed into a single commit automatically when integrating. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
4ea4662
to
5943791
Compare
…producible) Backport-of: 2bbf8a2a964a64d88298a3dd184459af506e58ed
e4e9311
to
2f5230d
Compare
@jmtd Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
The parent pull request that this pull request depends on has now been integrated and the target branch of this pull request has been updated. This means that changes from the dependent pull request can start to show up as belonging to this pull request, which may be confusing for reviewers. To remedy this situation, simply merge the latest changes from the new target branch into this pull request by running commands similar to these in the local repository for your personal fork: git checkout 8245543-jdk8u-dev
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# if there are conflicts, follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push |
@jmtd This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine. I've approved the bug as well. Feel free to integrate and then rebase #169. Thank you!
/integrate |
Going to push as commit d2df91d. |
A backport of 8245543 to jdk8u-dev for cgroups v2 support.
Not clean: needed minor adjusting for 8u approach to log output.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev pull/159/head:pull/159
$ git checkout pull/159
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/159
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev pull/159/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 159
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 159
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/159.diff