New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8139348: Deprecate 3DES and RC4 in Kerberos #312
Conversation
👋 Welcome back evergizova! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
FYI @gnu-andrew I think you've looked into that as well... |
Could anyone review this backport please? |
Yes, I'll take a look. As Severin says, I was planning to do this one too, so thanks for taking it on. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look good to me. I'll add my usual proviso that Arrays.asList
is modifiable while the original List.of
method isn't, but this doesn't matter for a test that only calls three read only methods on the result.
JDK-8180569 might be worth looking at for backport, but isn't a pre-requisite for this.
Please flag with jdk8u-fix-request
for approval.
@kvergizova This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 14 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@gnu-andrew) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
Thanks for the review, @gnu-andrew! |
No problem, sorry for the delay. I only just saw this today. I've approved the bug. If you integrate, I can sponsor the commit and we can get this one in. Thanks for the backport :) |
/integrate |
@kvergizova |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 6244292.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@gnu-andrew @kvergizova Pushed as commit 6244292. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
I'd like to backport JDK-8139348 to 8u for parity with Oracle 8u351.
CSR JDK-8262273 is approved for 8-pool.
11u patch doesn't apply cleanly, some tests need to be adjusted:
Tested with jdk_security and tier1, no regressions.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/312/head:pull/312
$ git checkout pull/312
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/312
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/312/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 312
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 312
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/312.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment