Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8307837: [8u] Check step in GHA should also print errors #317

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zzambers
Copy link
Contributor

@zzambers zzambers commented May 10, 2023

Check step currently only prints list of failed tests. It should also print tests, which finished with error (e.g. test ending on timeout). See e.g.: https://github.com/naotoj/jdk8u-dev/actions/runs/4931190096/jobs/8813500528


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • JDK-8307837 needs maintainer approval
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8307837: [8u] Check step in GHA should also print errors (Enhancement - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/317/head:pull/317
$ git checkout pull/317

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/317
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/317/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 317

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 317

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/317.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 10, 2023

👋 Welcome back zzambers! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 10, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 10, 2023

Webrevs

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 7, 2023

@zzambers This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 6, 2023

@zzambers This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the /open pull request command.

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot closed this Jul 6, 2023
@zzambers
Copy link
Contributor Author

/open

@openjdk openjdk bot reopened this Jul 10, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 10, 2023

@zzambers This pull request is now open

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 7, 2023

@zzambers This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 4, 2023

@zzambers This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the /open pull request command.

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot closed this Sep 4, 2023
@zzambers
Copy link
Contributor Author

zzambers commented Sep 5, 2023

/open

@openjdk openjdk bot reopened this Sep 5, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 5, 2023

@zzambers This pull request is now open

Copy link
Member

@gnu-andrew gnu-andrew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look fine, though the referenced link has expired.

Any way we can test this works as expected?

@zzambers
Copy link
Contributor Author

zzambers commented Sep 19, 2023

@gnu-andrew I have made branch with dummy failing and erroring test added on top of this. Works as expected, see: https://github.com/zzambers/jdk8u-dev/actions/runs/6234555212/job/16923516100

Copy link
Member

@gnu-andrew gnu-andrew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. Looks good to me.
Please label the bug with jdk8u-fix-request and add an appropriate comment to request approval.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 25, 2023

@zzambers This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8307837: [8u] Check step in GHA should also print errors

Reviewed-by: andrew

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 60 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 25, 2023
@gnu-andrew
Copy link
Member

Approved.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 28, 2023

⚠️ @zzambers This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@zzambers
Copy link
Contributor Author

zzambers commented Oct 2, 2023

@gnu-andrew thanks
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 2, 2023

Going to push as commit 27058b2.
Since your change was applied there have been 60 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 2, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 2, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 2, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 2, 2023

@zzambers Pushed as commit 27058b2.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants