Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8159454: [TEST_BUG] javax/swing/ToolTipManager/7123767/bug7123767.java: number of checked graphics configurations should be limited #405

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor

@ktakakuri ktakakuri commented Dec 14, 2023

Hi all,

This is a clean backport of JDK-8159454: [TEST_BUG] javax/swing/ToolTipManager/7123767/bug7123767.java: number of checked graphics configurations should be limited.
I have confirmed that bug7123767.java passes by backporting this fix.

Thank you.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8159454 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8159454: [TEST_BUG] javax/swing/ToolTipManager/7123767/bug7123767.java: number of checked graphics configurations should be limited (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/405/head:pull/405
$ git checkout pull/405

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/405
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/405/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 405

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 405

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/405.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 14, 2023

👋 Welcome back ktakakuri! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 64a2db9060bc9fc81afe451d0b057af57fc10f94 8159454: [TEST_BUG] javax/swing/ToolTipManager/7123767/bug7123767.java: number of checked graphics configurations should be limited Dec 14, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 14, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 14, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 14, 2023

Webrevs

* @key headful
* @key randomness
*
* @modules java.desktop/sun.awt
Copy link
Member

@mrserb mrserb Jan 9, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@modules tag is not needed for jdk8

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But looks like nobody cares when backport such changes: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aopenjdk%2Fjdk8u-dev%20%40modules%20&type=code

So it is probably looks fine, @gnu-andrew what do you think?

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 6, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@mrserb
Copy link
Member

mrserb commented Feb 14, 2024

keep open

Copy link
Member

@gnu-andrew gnu-andrew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Patch looks clean, bar the header and the indentation changes around robot.waitIdle(). I confirmed all but the header are the same as 11u once this patch is applied.

As to @modules, we can either drop it here or do it as part of a cleanup in bulk as for #441

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 23, 2024

⚠️ @ktakakuri This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 13, 2024

@ktakakuri This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8159454: [TEST_BUG] javax/swing/ToolTipManager/7123767/bug7123767.java: number of checked graphics configurations should be limited

Reviewed-by: andrew, serb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 78 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@gnu-andrew, @mrserb) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approval request This fix applis cleanly to 8u from jdk9,
There is no risk, because the logic around the changes and the cause of the problem is the same as in jdk9,
and I have confirmed that bug7123767.java passes by backporting the fix.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2024

@ktakakuri
8159454: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Apr 3, 2024
@gnu-andrew
Copy link
Member

I guess we're removing @modules elsewhere then.
/approve yes

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 15, 2024

@gnu-andrew
8159454: The approval request has been approved.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Apr 15, 2024
@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

After requesting the fix request I made an additional commit, which is a fix for a syntax error.

@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Apr 17, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 17, 2024

@ktakakuri
Your change (at version 3c33db9) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Going to push as commit 6a09637.
Since your change was applied there have been 78 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 17, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 17, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Apr 17, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 17, 2024

@phohensee @ktakakuri Pushed as commit 6a09637.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants