Skip to content

Conversation

@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor

@jerboaa jerboaa commented Dec 14, 2023

Clean backport modulo context differences (after path suffeling). After this, CAInterop.java is the same as in openjdk/jdk11u. Patch as requested in #401

Testing:

  • GHA (includes new tests).

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8268916 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8268916: Tests for AffirmTrust roots (Enhancement - P3 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/406/head:pull/406
$ git checkout pull/406

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/406
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/406/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 406

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 406

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/406.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 14, 2023

👋 Welcome back sgehwolf! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 8c1bb2b28066ee32bef22110df06318d938c7d8b 8268916: Tests for AffirmTrust roots Dec 14, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 14, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 14, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 14, 2023

Webrevs

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

linux-x86 GHA failure is unrelated.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 14, 2023

⚠️ @jerboaa This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Dec 14, 2023
@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

jerboaa commented Dec 15, 2023

linux-x86 GHA failure is unrelated.

Yes, thanks. We see the 32-bit failure of gc/concurrentMarkSweep/CheckAllocateAndSystemGC.java regularly. This patch doesn't change anything that could be related.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 12, 2024

@jerboaa This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

jerboaa commented Jan 12, 2024

Keep open please.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 9, 2024

@jerboaa This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

jerboaa commented Feb 12, 2024

Keep open.

Copy link
Member

@gnu-andrew gnu-andrew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Backport looks clean, other than the context difference from applying the eMudhra changes first.

@gnu-andrew
Copy link
Member

Approval comment from bug: "Please approve this low-risk test addition for 8u. The patch applies cleanly but it has been re-ordered so as to match the final JDK 11u file (CAInterop.java). Test-only change low risk. Patch reviewed by Paul Hohensee."
/approve yes

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 16, 2024

@gnu-andrew
8268916: The approval request has been approved.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 16, 2024

@jerboaa This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8268916: Tests for AffirmTrust roots

Reviewed-by: phh, andrew

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Feb 16, 2024
@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

jerboaa commented Feb 28, 2024

Failing test gc/logging/TestGCId.java on 32 bit linux is unrelated.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 28, 2024

Going to push as commit f63643b.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 28, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 28, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 28, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 28, 2024

@jerboaa Pushed as commit f63643b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants