Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8248001: javadoc generates invalid HTML pages whose ftp:// links are broken #420

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor

@ktakakuri ktakakuri commented Jan 16, 2024

I would like to backport
8248001: javadoc generates invalid HTML pages whose ftp:// links are broken.
There are minor differences regarding DocRoot, but otherwise this is a clean backport.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8248001 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8248001: javadoc generates invalid HTML pages whose ftp:// links are broken (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/420/head:pull/420
$ git checkout pull/420

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/420
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/420/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 420

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 420

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/420.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 16, 2024

👋 Welcome back ktakakuri! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport bb95dda0ac5032e4df582f2903dcbbbbaef9e8c4 8248001: javadoc generates invalid HTML pages whose ftp:// links are broken Jan 16, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 16, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 16, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Webrevs

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 13, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 12, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the /open pull request command.

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot closed this Mar 12, 2024
@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

/open

@openjdk openjdk bot reopened this Mar 25, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 25, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request is now open

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 25, 2024

@ktakakuri This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8248001: javadoc generates invalid HTML pages whose ftp:// links are broken

Reviewed-by: phh

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 219 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8c4a65b: 8351098: Bump update version of OpenJDK: 8u462
  • 6a7d893: 8350816: [8u] Update TzdbZoneRulesCompiler to ignore HST/EST/MST links
  • 8f8531c: 8285756: clean up use of bad arguments for @clean in langtools tests
  • 24cade6: 8340552: Harden TzdbZoneRulesCompiler against missing zone names
  • 898e131: 8261020: Wrong format parameter in create_emergency_chunk_path
  • 0b5a2e7: 8346140: [8u] tools/jar/ExtractFilesTest.java and tools/jar/MultipleManifestTest.java fails with jtreg5.1
  • 8eccf89: 8340660: [8u] Test com/sun/jdi/PrivateTransportTest.sh fails on MacOS
  • 85fb26b: 8244966: Add .vscode to .hgignore and .gitignore
  • 5ccff2c: 8348211: [8u] sun/management/jmxremote/startstop/JMXStartStopTest.java fails after backport of JDK-8066708
  • f5e9a25: 8349166: Bad indentation in backport of JDK-8250825
  • ... and 209 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/compare/2f81fb4b586097e5cb3e139e2131dd7a5b6312a5...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could anyone review this backport please?
This is a simple fix, almost a clean backport.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 16, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can someone please review this backport?

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 10, 2024

⚠️ @ktakakuri This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approval request There are minor differences regarding DocRoot, but otherwise this is a clean backport.
There is no risk, because the logic around the changes and the cause of the problem is the same as in jdk18.
Testing: test/langtools on Windows x86_64

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 12, 2024

@ktakakuri
8248001: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Jun 12, 2024
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 10, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pull request is pending approval of the Fix Request.
I comment to not close.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 2, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pull request is pending approval of the Fix Request.
I comment to not close.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 1, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pull request is pending approval of the Fix Request.
I comment to not close.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 30, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

1 similar comment
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 31, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 31, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pull request is pending approval of the Fix Request.
I comment to not close.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 28, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pull request is pending approval of the Fix Request.
I comment to not close.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 31, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pull request is pending approval of the Fix Request.
I comment to not close.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 3, 2025

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pull request is pending approval of the Fix Request.
I comment to not close.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Feb 25, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 12, 2025

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants