Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8035395: sun/management/jmxremote/startstop/JMXStartStopTest.java fails intermittently: Port already in use #429

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor

@ktakakuri ktakakuri commented Jan 25, 2024

Hi all,

This is a backport of JDK-8035395: sun/management/jmxremote/startstop/JMXStartStopTest.java fails intermittently: Port already in use.
The JMXStartStopTest.java test failures reported in this issue also occur in JDK8.
This backport improves testing to use a dynamically allocated port.

testing: jdk/test/sun/management/jmxremote/startstop/JMXStartStopTest.java

With this fix alone, the test remains unstable.
Backporting with JDK-8035395 makes JMXStartStopTest.java more stable.

Thank you.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8035395 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8035395: sun/management/jmxremote/startstop/JMXStartStopTest.java fails intermittently: Port already in use (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/429/head:pull/429
$ git checkout pull/429

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/429
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/429/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 429

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 429

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/429.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 25, 2024

👋 Welcome back ktakakuri! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 70f2238ba9a81ba0bb3fe6cbd98a553009992ecb 8035395: sun/management/jmxremote/startstop/JMXStartStopTest.java fails intermittently: Port already in use Jan 25, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 25, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 25, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 25, 2024

Webrevs

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 22, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 29, 2024

⚠️ @ktakakuri This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

windows-x86 GHA builds seem broken due to unrelated issue.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 13, 2024

@ktakakuri This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8035395: sun/management/jmxremote/startstop/JMXStartStopTest.java fails intermittently: Port already in use

Reviewed-by: phh, andrew

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 68 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • bfb1a7d: 4660158: TTY: NumberFormatException while trying to set values by 'set' command
  • 0357abb: 8324632: Update Zlib Data Compression Library to Version 1.3.1
  • 61dde50: 8333724: Problem list security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#teliasonerarootcav1
  • 8892b81: 8326521: JFR: CompilerPhase event test fails on windows 32 bit
  • 9da7380: 8331730: [8u] GHA: update sysroot for cross builds to Debian bullseye
  • 9a7aa79: 8333669: [8u] GHA: Dead VS2010 download link
  • 663ecc7: 8333126: Bump update version of OpenJDK: 8u432
  • db860f0: 8326529: JFR: Test for CompilerCompile events fails due to time out
  • 012f59c: 8316138: Add GlobalSign 2 TLS root certificates
  • 7bcaeb5: 8239965: XMLEncoder/Test4625418.java fails due to "Error: Cp943 - can't read properly"
  • ... and 58 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/compare/552c6866d8ad71ef247b5303f78fa7a65506aea9...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@phohensee, @gnu-andrew) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approval request I would like to backport this issue to 8u because the test fails also with jdk8.
There is no risk because it is a test-only fix.
Only with this fix , the test will not passed.
This backport is followed by a JDK-8066708 backport to stabilize the test.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2024

@ktakakuri
8035395: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Apr 3, 2024
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 1, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 29, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the /open pull request command.

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot closed this May 29, 2024
@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

/open

@openjdk openjdk bot reopened this May 30, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 30, 2024

@ktakakuri This pull request is now open

Copy link
Member

@gnu-andrew gnu-andrew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Backport looks good to me.

I see some differences with the 11u version, but this is because 8u got JDK-8044135 first, whereas this comes after this patch in 11u. JDK-8044135 removes test_13 and test_14 which were patched by 8035395 in 11u, and also alters the method signatures.

@gnu-andrew
Copy link
Member

/approve yes

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 15, 2024

@gnu-andrew
8035395: The approval request has been approved.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Jun 15, 2024
@ktakakuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jun 16, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 16, 2024

@ktakakuri
Your change (at version 98cff0f) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 17, 2024

Going to push as commit 6abb3f2.
Since your change was applied there have been 69 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 6838605: 8311666: Disabled tests in test/jdk/sun/java2d/marlin
  • bfb1a7d: 4660158: TTY: NumberFormatException while trying to set values by 'set' command
  • 0357abb: 8324632: Update Zlib Data Compression Library to Version 1.3.1
  • 61dde50: 8333724: Problem list security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#teliasonerarootcav1
  • 8892b81: 8326521: JFR: CompilerPhase event test fails on windows 32 bit
  • 9da7380: 8331730: [8u] GHA: update sysroot for cross builds to Debian bullseye
  • 9a7aa79: 8333669: [8u] GHA: Dead VS2010 download link
  • 663ecc7: 8333126: Bump update version of OpenJDK: 8u432
  • db860f0: 8326529: JFR: Test for CompilerCompile events fails due to time out
  • 012f59c: 8316138: Add GlobalSign 2 TLS root certificates
  • ... and 59 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/compare/552c6866d8ad71ef247b5303f78fa7a65506aea9...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 17, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 17, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Jun 17, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 17, 2024

@phohensee @ktakakuri Pushed as commit 6abb3f2.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.


jcmd(CMD_STOP);
jcmd(CMD_START,
"jmxremote.ssl=false",
"jmxremote.port=" + port1
"jmxremote.port=" + pa.getPort1()
);
testConnect(port1);
Copy link
Member

@mrserb mrserb Aug 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fyi: change to port1 is missed, see #541

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants