8130895: Test javax/swing/system/6799345/TestShutdown.java fails on Solaris11 Sparcv9

[ktakakuri]

I would like to backport
JDK-8130895: Test javax/swing/system/6799345/TestShutdown.java fails on Solaris11 Sparcv9
The original patch applies cleanly after paths changes.

Testing:
build on Solaris11.4 sparcv9
tire1, jdk_awt and javax/swing/system/6799345/TestShutdown.java on Solaris11.4 sparcv9

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8130895: Test javax/swing/system/6799345/TestShutdown.java fails on Solaris11 Sparcv9

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev pull/57/head:pull/57
$ git checkout pull/57

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/57
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev pull/57/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 57

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 57

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/57.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back ktakakuri! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (3f3956e4)

[ktakakuri]

Could someone please review this backport?

[ktakakuri]

Could anyone review the PR please?

[ktakakuri]

Could someone please review this backport?

[ktakakuri]

Could anyone review this PR please?

[phohensee]

/clean

[openjdk]

@phohensee This backport pull request is now marked as clean

[openjdk]

@ktakakuri This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8130895: Test javax/swing/system/6799345/TestShutdown.java fails on Solaris11 Sparcv9

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 63 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 972112e: 8233019: java.lang.Class.isPrimitive() (C1) returns wrong result if Klass* is aligned to 32bit
• e005185: 8235218: Minimal VM is broken after JDK-8173361
• eeef4de: 8150669: C1 intrinsic for Class.isPrimitive
• 6e8292f: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee
• ce73401: 8136354: [TEST_BUG] Test java/awt/image/RescaleOp/RescaleAlphaTest.java with Bad action for script
• a3c0ed2: 8087283: Add support for the XML Signature here() function to the JDK XPath implementation
• 1b4f32d: 8173361: various crashes in JvmtiExport::post_compiled_method_load
• cf6b628: 8260589: Crash in JfrTraceIdLoadBarrier::load(_jclass*)
• 83e9095: 8280963: Incorrect PrintFlags formatting on Windows
• 820ab13: 8235385: Crash on aarch64 JDK due to long offset
• ... and 53 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/compare/57d8d29080414dd038fffff1b97d97f3ab3f1570...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[ktakakuri]

@phohensee
Is it ok if I integrate?

[jerboaa]

@ktakakuri You need to apply for approval of the bug. Add a Fix Request comment explaining why the fix is needed and what the risks are. Also add a jdk8u-fix-request label so that maintainers will see the request. Once you have jdk8u-fix-yes on the bug you can integrate.

[ktakakuri]

@ktakakuri You need to apply for approval of the bug. Add a Fix Request comment explaining why the fix is needed and what the risks are. Also add a jdk8u-fix-request label so that maintainers will see the request. Once you have jdk8u-fix-yes on the bug you can integrate.

Thank you for your comment.
I am concerned about the lack of reviewers.

[jerboaa]

@ktakakuri Unfortunately, the OpenJDK wiki is offline at the moment due to an ongoing migration. Our wiki page explains this. In a nutshell, clean backports don't need a separate review. So in your case only maintainer approval is needed. That's what the label process described above is for. Only modified patches need a review. I take it you've run tests on relevant platforms and have seen no regressions?

[ktakakuri]

@ktakakuri Unfortunately, the OpenJDK wiki is offline at the moment due to an ongoing migration. Our wiki page explains this. In a nutshell, clean backports don't need a separate review. So in your case only maintainer approval is needed. That's what the label process described above is for. Only modified patches need a review. I take it you've run tests on relevant platforms and have seen no regressions?

Thank you, that makes sense.
I added the Fix-request label.

[phohensee]

If you add a /integrate comment, I can sponsor.

[ktakakuri]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@ktakakuri
Your change (at version 3f3956e) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[phohensee]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 40a1859.
Since your change was applied there have been 66 commits pushed to the master branch:

• de9f149: 8194873: right ALT key hotkeys no longer work in Swing components
• 0de66bd: 8282538: PKCS11 tests fail on CentOS Stream 9
• 4f7dd0c: 8256722: handle VC++:1927 VS2019 in abstract_vm_version
• 972112e: 8233019: java.lang.Class.isPrimitive() (C1) returns wrong result if Klass* is aligned to 32bit
• e005185: 8235218: Minimal VM is broken after JDK-8173361
• eeef4de: 8150669: C1 intrinsic for Class.isPrimitive
• 6e8292f: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee
• ce73401: 8136354: [TEST_BUG] Test java/awt/image/RescaleOp/RescaleAlphaTest.java with Bad action for script
• a3c0ed2: 8087283: Add support for the XML Signature here() function to the JDK XPath implementation
• 1b4f32d: 8173361: various crashes in JvmtiExport::post_compiled_method_load
• ... and 56 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/compare/57d8d29080414dd038fffff1b97d97f3ab3f1570...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@phohensee @ktakakuri Pushed as commit 40a1859.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.