-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 171
8228658: test GetTotalSafepointTime.java fails on fast Linux machines with Total safepoint time 0 ms #578
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@sendaoYan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 114 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@phohensee) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
|
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
|
The GHA report several failures, all the failures unreleated to this PR.
|
|
@sendaoYan This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
|
/open |
|
@sendaoYan This pull request is already open |
|
@sendaoYan This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
|
/open |
|
@sendaoYan This pull request is already open |
|
@sendaoYan This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
|
/open |
|
@sendaoYan This pull request is already open |
|
@sendaoYan This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
|
/open |
|
@sendaoYan This pull request is already open |
|
@sendaoYan This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
|
Keep it open |
|
@sendaoYan This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
|
keep it open. |
|
@sendaoYan This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
|
Hi, can anyone take look this PR. |
|
|
|
/approval request Backport from jdk11u-dev to make the test more robustness, test fix only, no risk. The change has been verified locally. |
|
@sendaoYan |
|
Thanks for the review and approved @phohensee @jerboaa /integrate |
|
@sendaoYan |
|
/sponsor |
|
Going to push as commit 5a6e681.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@phohensee @sendaoYan Pushed as commit 5a6e681. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
|
Thanks @phohensee |
Hi all,
We observerd the test
sun/management/HotspotRuntimeMBean/GetTotalSafepointTime.javaintermittent fails on jdk8u-dev. The failure phenomenon same to JDK-8228658. So I want to backport this PR from jdk11u-dev to jdk8u-dev.Only the copyright year backported not cleanly, the copyright year modified by JDK-6719955 and JDK-6943119 in jdk8u-dev. Other parts are backport cleanly.
The change has been verified locally, make the test more robustness, test fix only, no risk.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/578/head:pull/578$ git checkout pull/578Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/578$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/578/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 578View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 578Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/578.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment