Skip to content

8285756: clean up use of bad arguments for @clean in langtools tests #618

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

satyenme
Copy link

@satyenme satyenme commented Jan 28, 2025

Backporting JDK-8285756: clean up use of bad arguments for @clean in langtools tests. This adjusts test tags to be compatible with newer versions of jtreg. Backport is not clean due to not having some of the newer tests, and not providing the --source 8 arg. Ran GHA Sanity Checks and local Tier 1 and Tier 2 tests.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8285756 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8285756: clean up use of bad arguments for @<!---->clean in langtools tests (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/618/head:pull/618
$ git checkout pull/618

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/618
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/618/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 618

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 618

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/618.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 28, 2025

👋 Welcome back ssubramaniam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 28, 2025

@satyenme This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8285756: clean up use of bad arguments for `@clean` in langtools tests

Reviewed-by: phh

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 20 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 24cade6: 8340552: Harden TzdbZoneRulesCompiler against missing zone names
  • 898e131: 8261020: Wrong format parameter in create_emergency_chunk_path
  • 0b5a2e7: 8346140: [8u] tools/jar/ExtractFilesTest.java and tools/jar/MultipleManifestTest.java fails with jtreg5.1
  • 8eccf89: 8340660: [8u] Test com/sun/jdi/PrivateTransportTest.sh fails on MacOS
  • 85fb26b: 8244966: Add .vscode to .hgignore and .gitignore
  • 5ccff2c: 8348211: [8u] sun/management/jmxremote/startstop/JMXStartStopTest.java fails after backport of JDK-8066708
  • f5e9a25: 8349166: Bad indentation in backport of JDK-8250825
  • fc88d51: 8255466: C2 crashes at ciObject::get_oop() const+0x0
  • 88a7829: 8339644: Improve parsing of Day/Month in tzdata rules
  • 4c50940: 8316193: jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestListenerLeak.java java.lang.Exception: Could not find leak
  • ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/compare/5a4b44089f3f95b92620ef3a7b49f2390b70afaa...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@phohensee) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 3312d8c620003125a88540fd5b2bacff34732ade 8285756: clean up use of bad arguments for @clean in langtools tests Jan 28, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 28, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 28, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 28, 2025

⚠️ @satyenme This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@satyenme
Copy link
Author

/approval request fixes test tags to work with newer jtreg, low risk, only affects test code, tested OK

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 29, 2025

@satyenme
8285756: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Jan 29, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Feb 25, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 26, 2025

@satyenme This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@satyenme
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Feb 26, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 26, 2025

@satyenme
Your change (at version 34c19cf) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Going to push as commit 8f8531c.
Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 24cade6: 8340552: Harden TzdbZoneRulesCompiler against missing zone names
  • 898e131: 8261020: Wrong format parameter in create_emergency_chunk_path
  • 0b5a2e7: 8346140: [8u] tools/jar/ExtractFilesTest.java and tools/jar/MultipleManifestTest.java fails with jtreg5.1
  • 8eccf89: 8340660: [8u] Test com/sun/jdi/PrivateTransportTest.sh fails on MacOS
  • 85fb26b: 8244966: Add .vscode to .hgignore and .gitignore
  • 5ccff2c: 8348211: [8u] sun/management/jmxremote/startstop/JMXStartStopTest.java fails after backport of JDK-8066708
  • f5e9a25: 8349166: Bad indentation in backport of JDK-8250825
  • fc88d51: 8255466: C2 crashes at ciObject::get_oop() const+0x0
  • 88a7829: 8339644: Improve parsing of Day/Month in tzdata rules
  • 4c50940: 8316193: jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestListenerLeak.java java.lang.Exception: Could not find leak
  • ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/compare/5a4b44089f3f95b92620ef3a7b49f2390b70afaa...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 26, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 26, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Feb 26, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 26, 2025

@phohensee @satyenme Pushed as commit 8f8531c.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants