New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8285727: [11u, 17u] Unify fix for JDK-8284920 with version from head #64
Conversation
👋 Welcome back yan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@yan-too Could you please change the PR title to |
@jerboaa Actually that complain is quite common thing because 8285727 indeed is not open: it is Resolved/Fixed. I will change the title but I'm afraid there might be a problem in future since a95482acf83cc03bc562baace0d55d831d0b2b41 is not in head as would be usual for the regular fixes (not backports) in 17. History of it stops in 17. Let's see though... it works! openjdk bot says "...with version from head" but has found the hash in 17u. Openjdk looks like hydra :-) |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
Thanks! Yeah, the original change was in 17 and downward, but it's still a backport of the JDK 17 unification change. jdk head got the same change with JDK-8284920. |
This is a clean backport modulo path changes. Trying to mark as such. |
/clean |
@jerboaa This backport pull request is now marked as clean |
@yan-too This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thank you, @jerboaa! This trick with forced clean also works (I tried it several times before with different results). |
/integrate |
I need to backport this fix prepared by Christoph Langer to jdk8u, too. Without it, further backports using Token would be painful. The fix is not technically a backport from upstream for obvious reason so it would require review etc.
Progress
Issue
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u-dev pull/64/head:pull/64
$ git checkout pull/64
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/64
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u-dev pull/64/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 64
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 64
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u-dev/pull/64.diff