8368308: ISO 4217 Amendment 180 Update

[jerboaa]

Not a clean backport to the JDK 11u version, but resolves were trivial. Changes to jdk/test/java/util/Currency/ValidateISO4217.java where manually redone.

Testing: java/util/Currency/ tests pass.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• JDK-8368308 needs maintainer approval
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8368308: ISO 4217 Amendment 180 Update (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewers

• Andrew John Hughes (@gnu-andrew - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u.git pull/80/head:pull/80
$ git checkout pull/80

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/80
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u.git pull/80/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 80

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 80

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u/pull/80.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back sgehwolf! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@jerboaa This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8368308: ISO 4217 Amendment 180 Update

Reviewed-by: andrew

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (aff43383)

[gnu-andrew]

resolves were trivial

The only one I see is the manual application in ValidateISO4217.java of the new currency code because of the different indentation. This is due to 8u not having the refactoring in JDK-8310923 which would in turn require a new JTreg and the headaches that involves (it took a long time to go to 11u , IIRC). Were there any others?

[openjdk]

⚠️ @jerboaa This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

[jerboaa]

resolves were trivial

The only one I see is the manual application in ValidateISO4217.java of the new currency code because of the different indentation. This is due to 8u not having the refactoring in JDK-8310923 which would in turn require a new JTreg and the headaches that involves (it took a long time to go to 11u , IIRC). Were there any others?

No. But paths to files are different in 8u as well.

[jerboaa]

Thanks for the quick review!

[jerboaa]

/approval request Please allow this backport in for JDK 8u472 (October) since it includes currency updates which are going to be in effect before the next update in January 2026. Those amendment updates are usually low risk. The patch needed trivial resolves in ValidateISO4217.java other than path shuffeling. Currency tests pass and patch is reviewed by Andrew Hughes.

[openjdk]

@jerboaa
8368308: The approval request has been created successfully.

[gnu-andrew]

resolves were trivial

The only one I see is the manual application in ValidateISO4217.java of the new currency code because of the different indentation. This is due to 8u not having the refactoring in JDK-8310923 which would in turn require a new JTreg and the headaches that involves (it took a long time to go to 11u , IIRC). Were there any others?

No. But paths to files are different in 8u as well.

Oh yeah, I tend to still count that as clean. The only ones to really worry about are new files. We've had the odd test sneak into the wrong tree (particularly with the big JFR change). If you've patched the same context in an existing file, then this should imply the paths have been shuffled correctly.

[gnu-andrew]

/approve yes

[openjdk]

@gnu-andrew
8368308: The approval request has been approved.

[jerboaa]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 2e6cbc9.

[openjdk]

@jerboaa Pushed as commit 2e6cbc9.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.