Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8313900: Possible NULL pointer access in NativeAudioSpectrum and NativeVideoBuffer #1204

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sashamatveev
Copy link
Member

@sashamatveev sashamatveev commented Aug 7, 2023

  • Fixed by checking for NULL pointer after memory allocation.
  • In NativeVideoBuffer std::nothrow was added when allocating jint array, so new will return NULL instead of throwing exception. This done for consistency and also it is not clear how well JNI handles C++ exceptions in this case and what value will Java code get if exception is thrown.

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (2 reviews required, with at least 1 Reviewer, 1 Author)

Issue

  • JDK-8313900: Possible NULL pointer access in NativeAudioSpectrum and NativeVideoBuffer (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1204/head:pull/1204
$ git checkout pull/1204

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1204
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1204/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1204

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1204

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1204.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 7, 2023

👋 Welcome back almatvee! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Ready for review label Aug 7, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 7, 2023

Webrevs

@kevinrushforth
Copy link
Member

Reviewers: @kevinrushforth @arapte

/reviewers 2

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 8, 2023

@kevinrushforth
The total number of required reviews for this PR (including the jcheck configuration and the last /reviewers command) is now set to 2 (with at least 1 Reviewer, 1 Author).

Copy link
Member

@kevinrushforth kevinrushforth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 8, 2023

@sashamatveev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8313900: Possible NULL pointer access in NativeAudioSpectrum and NativeVideoBuffer

Reviewed-by: kcr, arapte

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 771273f: 8313799: Remove lockItemOnEdit flag from (Tree)TableCell
  • 1752b62: 8313856: Replace VLA with malloc in pango

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Ready to be integrated label Aug 8, 2023
@sashamatveev
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 8, 2023

Going to push as commit 9f180e2.
Since your change was applied there have been 2 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 771273f: 8313799: Remove lockItemOnEdit flag from (Tree)TableCell
  • 1752b62: 8313856: Replace VLA with malloc in pango

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 8, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 8, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Ready to be integrated rfr Ready for review labels Aug 8, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 8, 2023

@sashamatveev Pushed as commit 9f180e2.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants