Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8260013: Snapshot does not work for nodes in a subscene #1332

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

lukostyra
Copy link
Contributor

@lukostyra lukostyra commented Jan 12, 2024

Originally this issue showed the problem of Node being incorrectly rendered (clipped) when snapshotting, compared to a snapshot of the whole Scene. Later on there was another problem added - lights not being taken into account if they are added to a SubScene.

As it later turned out, the original problem from this bug report is a problem with ParallelCamera incorrectly estimating near/far clipping planes, which just happened to reveal itself while snapshotting a Node. During testing I found out you can make the Node clip regardless of snapshot mechanism. Clipping issue was moved to a separate bug report and this PR only fixes the inconsistency in lights being gathered for a snapshot.

Scene.doSnapshot() was expanded to also check if SubScene provided to it is non-null and to fetch lights assigned to it. Scenario was tested with added SnapshotLightsTest.

Rest of the tests were checked and don't produce any noticeable regressions.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (2 reviews required, with at least 1 Reviewer, 1 Author)

Issue

  • JDK-8260013: Snapshot does not work for nodes in a subscene (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1332/head:pull/1332
$ git checkout pull/1332

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1332
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1332/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1332

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1332

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1332.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 12, 2024

👋 Welcome back lkostyra! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Ready for review label Jan 12, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 12, 2024

Webrevs

@kevinrushforth
Copy link
Member

/reviewers 2

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 15, 2024

@kevinrushforth
The total number of required reviews for this PR (including the jcheck configuration and the last /reviewers command) is now set to 2 (with at least 1 Reviewer, 1 Author).

context.lights = new NGLightBase[scene.lights.size()];
for (int i = 0; i < scene.lights.size(); i++) {
context.lights[i] = scene.lights.get(i).getPeer();
int totalLightCount = 0;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here's a suggestion: you might be able to replace all of the new code, including the accumulateLightsForSnapshot method, with the following shorter code:

Stream<NGLightBase> lights = Stream.concat(
    Optional.ofNullable(scene).stream().flatMap(s -> s.lights.stream()).map(LightBase::getPeer),
    Optional.ofNullable(subScene).stream().flatMap(s -> s.getLights().stream()).map(LightBase::getPeer));

context.lights = lights.toArray(NGLightBase[]::new);

Copy link
Contributor Author

@lukostyra lukostyra Jan 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I changed the code as suggested.

After that Snapshot3DTest code started showing some failures, this was due to NGShape3D code not checking if it gets an empty (length == 0) array and throwing IndexOutOfBoundsException. I patched that as well and didn't see any regressions in tests afterwards.

Uses suggested simpler implementation using Java's Streams.

Needed an additional check in NGShape3D, otherwise IndexOutOfBounds was
thrown
Copy link
Member

@kevinrushforth kevinrushforth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks mostly correct except for the case where both the Scene and the SubScene have lights. It seems worth adding a test for this case as well.

Snapshot now includes lights only from subScene if it is not null, which
matches how SubScenes are rendered
@lukostyra
Copy link
Contributor Author

Corrected the behavior and added a test as well

Copy link
Member

@kevinrushforth kevinrushforth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I left a few minor cleanup comments. I'll reapprove when/if you fix them.

@lukostyra
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cleanup done, should be all OK now

Copy link
Collaborator

@mstr2 mstr2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 30, 2024

@lukostyra This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8260013: Snapshot does not work for nodes in a subscene

Reviewed-by: kcr, mstrauss

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 23 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Ready to be integrated label Jan 30, 2024
@lukostyra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 30, 2024

Going to push as commit d653a31.
Since your change was applied there have been 23 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 30, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 30, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Ready to be integrated rfr Ready for review labels Jan 30, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 30, 2024

@lukostyra Pushed as commit d653a31.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@lukostyra lukostyra deleted the snapshot_nodes-8260013 branch February 8, 2024 13:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants