Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8240688: Remove the JavaBeanXxxPropertyBuilders constructors #140

Conversation

nlisker
Copy link
Collaborator

@nlisker nlisker commented Mar 6, 2020

Followup to the deprecation of the JavaBeanXxxPropertyBuilders constructors.

CSR


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8240688: Remove the JavaBeanXxxPropertyBuilders constructors

Reviewers

  • Kevin Rushforth (kcr - Reviewer)
  • Ambarish Rapte (arapte - Reviewer)

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/140/head:pull/140
$ git checkout pull/140

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 6, 2020

👋 Welcome back nlisker! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request.

@nlisker nlisker marked this pull request as ready for review March 6, 2020 17:51
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Ready for review label Mar 6, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 6, 2020

Webrevs

@kevinrushforth
Copy link
Member

/reviewers 2

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 6, 2020

@kevinrushforth
The number of required reviews for this PR is now set to 2 (with at least 1 of role reviewers).

@kevinrushforth
Copy link
Member

/csr

@openjdk openjdk bot added the csr Need approved CSR to integrate pull request label Mar 6, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 6, 2020

@kevinrushforth has indicated that a compatibility and specification (CSR) request is needed for this pull request.
@nlisker please create a CSR request and add link to it in JDK-8240689. This pull request cannot be integrated until the CSR request is approved.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Ready for review label Mar 6, 2020
@nlisker nlisker changed the title 8240689: Remove the JavaBeanXxxPropertyBuilders constructors 8240688: Remove the JavaBeanXxxPropertyBuilders constructors Mar 6, 2020
@nlisker
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nlisker commented Mar 6, 2020

Why was the rfr label not reinstated?

@kevinrushforth
Copy link
Member

@kevinrushforth
Copy link
Member

@arapte can you also review this?

@kevinrushforth
Copy link
Member

Now the the CSR is approved, we need something to "wake up" the Skara bot to notice that.
@edvbld @rwestberg is there a command that you would recommend to do this? Maybe typing /summary without actually adding a summary? Failing that we can wait for the second reviewer, but it would be nice to test Skara's CSR support prior to that (this is the first one where we've had an approved CSR since starting to use the /csr feature).

@openjdk openjdk bot added rfr Ready for review and removed csr Need approved CSR to integrate pull request labels Mar 9, 2020
Copy link
Member

@arapte arapte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.
Observed no build errors for apps, tests.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 9, 2020

@nlisker This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. When the change also fulfills all project specific requirements, type /integrate in a new comment to proceed. After integration, the commit message will be:

8240688: Remove the JavaBeanXxxPropertyBuilders constructors

Reviewed-by: kcr, arapte
  • If you would like to add a summary, use the /summary command.
  • To credit additional contributors, use the /contributor command.
  • To add additional solved issues, use the /solves command.

Since the source branch of this PR was last updated there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch. Since there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid automatic rebasing, please merge master into your branch, and then specify the current head hash when integrating, like this: /integrate cfa119348eb0f1d1a1f73986786cffb083b017eb.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Ready to be integrated label Mar 9, 2020
@nlisker
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nlisker commented Mar 9, 2020

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 9, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Ready to be integrated labels Mar 9, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 9, 2020

@nlisker The following commits have been pushed to master since your change was applied:

  • cfa1193: 8236685: [macOs] Remove obsolete file dialog subclasses

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit e3026b9.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Ready for review label Mar 9, 2020
@nlisker nlisker deleted the 8240688_Remove_the_JavaBeanXxxPropertyBuilders_constructors branch March 9, 2020 16:38
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 9, 2020

Mailing list message from Nir Lisker on openjfx-dev:

Changeset: e3026b9
Author: Nir Lisker <nlisker at openjdk.org>
Date: 2020-03-09 16:38:20 +0000
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/commit/e3026b9c

8240688: Remove the JavaBeanXxxPropertyBuilders constructors

Reviewed-by: kcr, arapte

! modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/property/adapter/JavaBeanBooleanPropertyBuilder.java
! modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/property/adapter/JavaBeanDoublePropertyBuilder.java
! modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/property/adapter/JavaBeanFloatPropertyBuilder.java
! modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/property/adapter/JavaBeanIntegerPropertyBuilder.java
! modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/property/adapter/JavaBeanLongPropertyBuilder.java
! modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/property/adapter/JavaBeanObjectPropertyBuilder.java
! modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/property/adapter/JavaBeanStringPropertyBuilder.java
! modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/property/adapter/ReadOnlyJavaBeanBooleanPropertyBuilder.java
! modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/property/adapter/ReadOnlyJavaBeanDoublePropertyBuilder.java
! modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/property/adapter/ReadOnlyJavaBeanFloatPropertyBuilder.java
! modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/property/adapter/ReadOnlyJavaBeanIntegerPropertyBuilder.java
! modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/property/adapter/ReadOnlyJavaBeanLongPropertyBuilder.java
! modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/property/adapter/ReadOnlyJavaBeanObjectPropertyBuilder.java
! modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/property/adapter/ReadOnlyJavaBeanStringPropertyBuilder.java

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 23, 2020

Mailing list message from Eric Bresie on openjfx-dev:

Is there any external skara documentation available on all these flags etc?

Eric Bresie
Ebresie at gmail.com

On March 7, 2020 at 8:25:02 AM CST, Kevin Rushforth <kcr at openjdk.java.net> wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 20:46:39 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <kcr at openjdk.org> wrote:

Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead).

@arapte can you also review this?

Now the the CSR is approved, we need something to "wake up" the Skara bot to notice that.
@edvbld @rwestberg is there a command that you would recommend to do this? Maybe typing `/summary` without actually adding a summary? Failing that we can wait for the second reviewer, but it would be nice to test Skara's CSR support prior to that (this is the first one where we've had an approved CSR since starting to use the `/csr` feature).

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/140

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants