Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8328752: Fix missing @Overrides in javafx.web #1424

Conversation

andy-goryachev-oracle
Copy link
Contributor

@andy-goryachev-oracle andy-goryachev-oracle commented Mar 21, 2024

Fix missing @OVERRIDES in javafx.web.

This is still a trivial change since all the spots are identified by the IDE.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (2 reviews required, with at least 1 Reviewer, 1 Author)

Issue

  • JDK-8328752: Fix missing @Overrides in javafx.web (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1424/head:pull/1424
$ git checkout pull/1424

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1424
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1424/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1424

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1424

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1424.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 21, 2024

👋 Welcome back angorya! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 21, 2024

@andy-goryachev-oracle This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8328752: Fix missing @Overrides in javafx.web

Reviewed-by: kcr, hmeda

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 20 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@andy-goryachev-oracle andy-goryachev-oracle marked this pull request as ready for review March 22, 2024 14:29
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Ready for review label Mar 22, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 22, 2024

Webrevs

@kevinrushforth
Copy link
Member

There are special considerations when touching files under modules/javafx.web/src/main/native/Source/WebCore/bindings/java/dom3/java, so it will need an extra pair of eyes. Also, this will need to be backported to earlier release trains to keep modules/javafx.web/src/main/native/ identical for all releases.

Reviewers: @kevinrushforth @HimaBinduMeda

/reviewers 2

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 22, 2024

@kevinrushforth
The total number of required reviews for this PR (including the jcheck configuration and the last /reviewers command) is now set to 2 (with at least 1 Reviewer, 1 Author).

@andy-goryachev-oracle
Copy link
Contributor Author

@HimaBinduMeda could you please take a look at this? Once reviewed, I'll start the back port chain. Thank you!

Copy link
Member

@kevinrushforth kevinrushforth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes look good.

Copy link
Contributor

@HimaBinduMeda HimaBinduMeda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Ready to be integrated label Apr 3, 2024
@andy-goryachev-oracle
Copy link
Contributor Author

thank you @HimaBinduMeda !

@andy-goryachev-oracle
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2024

Going to push as commit 483c640.
Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 3, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 3, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Ready to be integrated rfr Ready for review labels Apr 3, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2024

@andy-goryachev-oracle Pushed as commit 483c640.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@andy-goryachev-oracle andy-goryachev-oracle deleted the 8328752.override.web branch April 3, 2024 18:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants