8241455: Memory leak on replacing selection/focusModel #148

kleopatra · 2020-03-23T16:32:16Z

Several controls with selection/focusModels leave memory leaks on replacing the model.

Added tests for all such, those for the misbehaving models fail before and pass after the fix.

for convenience, the bug reference https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241455

Progress

Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
Commit message must refer to an issue
Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

JDK-8241455: Memory leak on replacing selection/focusModel

Reviewers

Ambarish Rapte (arapte - Reviewer)
Ajit Ghaisas (aghaisas - Reviewer)

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/148/head:pull/148
$ git checkout pull/148

bridgekeeper · 2020-03-23T16:33:11Z

👋 Welcome back fastegal! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request.

mlbridge · 2020-03-23T16:36:48Z

Webrevs

kevinrushforth · 2020-03-23T23:43:53Z

/reviewers 2

openjdk · 2020-03-23T23:44:01Z

@kevinrushforth
The number of required reviews for this PR is now set to 2 (with at least 1 of role reviewers).

kevinrushforth · 2020-03-23T23:45:21Z

I have basically the same comment / question as I asked in #147

In general, there are two approaches to avoiding listener-related memory leaks. One is to use a WeakListener; the other is to explicitly remove the listener when the object is removed or otherwise no longer needed.

Using a WeakListener is certainly easier, but runs the risk of the listener being removed too early and not cleaning up after itself. I'm not suggesting that's the case here, but it is worth looking at.

kevinrushforth · 2020-03-23T23:45:55Z

@arapte @aghaisas - Can you both review this?

kleopatra · 2020-03-26T11:37:06Z

I would like to widen the issue (and change this pull request accordingly) to include memory leaks of introduced selection- and focusModels in other controls that are caused by the basically same reason, that is strong references via listeners to controls' properties. The fix would be the same as well, that is wrap the listeners into weakXXListeners and register these.

The models suggested to include here:

TreeView: selection- and focusModel
TreeTableView: focusModel
TabPane: selectionModel

Not included would be memory leaks introduced by whacky listening of ChoiceBoxSkin and TabPaneSkin to properties of the selectionModel. The former will (most probably) be fixed as a side-effect of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8087555 (which I intend to take, if Ajit agrees :), will open a separate issue for the latter.

The extended fix here will have tests for replacing selection/focusModels with/out a skin registered for all controls having the respective models.

Not entirely certain about the formal procedure (locally fix and tests are - nearly, pending some cleanup - ready). Simply change titles, rebase and push again?

kevinrushforth · 2020-03-26T12:25:14Z

If Ambarish and Ajit are OK with this, then the procedure would be as you guessed: change the title of both the JBS bug and then this PR and push your new fix (with or without rebasing would be fine).

arapte · 2020-03-26T12:33:44Z

That is good idea to combine all similarly affected selection models. I think rebase won't be required just updating the PR with more commits should be good enough.

aghaisas · 2020-03-27T05:00:49Z

Not included would be memory leaks introduced by whacky listening of ChoiceBoxSkin and TabPaneSkin to properties of the selectionModel. The former will (most probably) be fixed as a side-effect of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8087555 (which I intend to take, if Ajit agrees :), will open a separate issue for the latter.

Please go ahead and take it up. Thanks!

Regarding combining other issue. I am OK with the idea.
Bug Title, Bug Description and PR Title should be updated accordingly.

arapte

Change looks good to me.
Similar to Skin classes the listeners here are also not explicitly removed.
But I don't see any problematic scenario even if the listeners of an old Model are executed before it gets GCed.
Suggested minor changes in test.

...s/javafx.controls/src/test/java/test/javafx/scene/control/SelectionFocusModelMemoryTest.java

arapte · 2020-04-01T19:34:09Z

...s/javafx.controls/src/test/java/test/javafx/scene/control/SelectionFocusModelMemoryTest.java

+            stage = new Stage();
+            stage.setScene(scene);
+        }
+        root.getChildren().add(node);


Will it be good to add a call to root.getChildren().removeAll() before adding the node to root ?

Will it be good to add a call to root.getChildren().removeAll() before adding the node to root ?

hmm .. don't think that it's necessary to clear out other children: the thing that actually matters is that the control goes active in the scenegraph and has a skin attached. Can you think of any context where any of the tests might get whacky if there are more than one nodes in the root?

Actually, that's a pattern (*cough, read that's more or less c&p'ed) I use in other tests, where it sometimes is allowed and expected that there are more than one.

Agree that It would not cause any problem in test execution.

arapte

looks good to me.

openjdk · 2020-04-03T09:44:39Z

@kleopatra This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. When the change also fulfills all project specific requirements, type /integrate in a new comment to proceed. After integration, the commit message will be:

8241455: Memory leak on replacing selection/focusModel

Reviewed-by: arapte, aghaisas

If you would like to add a summary, use the /summary command.
To credit additional contributors, use the /contributor command.
To add additional solved issues, use the /solves command.

Since the source branch of this PR was last updated there have been 10 commits pushed to the master branch. Since there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid automatic rebasing, please merge master into your branch, and then specify the current head hash when integrating, like this: /integrate 5906521cf2a605014f947f3216f5d1906bb8859d.

As you do not have Committer status in this project, an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@arapte, @aghaisas) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

kleopatra · 2020-04-03T11:40:39Z

/integrate

openjdk · 2020-04-03T11:41:04Z

@kleopatra
Your change (at version 8bed244) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

arapte · 2020-04-06T03:56:58Z

/sponsor

openjdk · 2020-04-06T03:57:27Z

@arapte @kleopatra The following commits have been pushed to master since your change was applied:

5906521: 8241370: Crash in JPEGImageLoader after fix for JDK-8212034
159f651: 8240542: Switch FX build to use JDK 14 as boot JDK
6d098fe: 8234959: FXMLLoader does not populate ENGINE_SCOPE Bindings with FILENAME and ARGV
d7f13f4: 8089828: RTL Orientation, the flag of a mnemonic is not placed under the mnemonic letter.
9ecc107: 8240539: Upgrade gradle to version 6.3
f3a3ea0: 8234471: Canvas in webview displayed with wrong scale on Windows
d12e71c: 8241474: Build failing on Ubuntu 20.04
2a7ab36: 8089134: [2D traversal, RTL] TraversalEngine only handles left/right key traversal correctly in RTL for top-level engine in ToolBar
2aa8218: 8235480: Regression: [RTL] Arrow keys navigation doesn't respect TableView orientation
e9c6119: 8240692: Cleanup of the javafx property objects

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 560ef17.

8241455: ChoiceBox - memory leak on replacing selectionModel

56d1695

openjdk bot added the rfr Ready for review label Mar 23, 2020

widened issue/fix/test for all controls with selection/focus models

d2918fb

kleopatra changed the title ~~8241455: ChoiceBox - memory leak on replacing selectionModel~~ 8241455: Memory leak on replacing selection/focusModel Mar 27, 2020

arapte suggested changes Apr 1, 2020

View reviewed changes

cleanup test as suggested in review

8bed244

arapte approved these changes Apr 2, 2020

View reviewed changes

aghaisas approved these changes Apr 3, 2020

View reviewed changes

openjdk bot added the ready Ready to be integrated label Apr 3, 2020

openjdk bot added the sponsor Ready to sponsor label Apr 3, 2020

openjdk bot closed this Apr 6, 2020

openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed sponsor Ready to sponsor labels Apr 6, 2020

openjdk bot removed ready Ready to be integrated rfr Ready for review labels Apr 6, 2020

kleopatra deleted the bug-fix-JDK-8241455 branch May 5, 2020 09:06

8241455: Memory leak on replacing selection/focusModel #148

8241455: Memory leak on replacing selection/focusModel #148

Uh oh!

Conversation

kleopatra commented Mar 23, 2020 • edited by openjdk bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Progress

Issue

Reviewers

Download

Uh oh!

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 23, 2020

Uh oh!

mlbridge bot commented Mar 23, 2020 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Webrevs

Uh oh!

kevinrushforth commented Mar 23, 2020

Uh oh!

openjdk bot commented Mar 23, 2020

Uh oh!

kevinrushforth commented Mar 23, 2020

Uh oh!

kevinrushforth commented Mar 23, 2020 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

kleopatra commented Mar 26, 2020

Uh oh!

kevinrushforth commented Mar 26, 2020

Uh oh!

arapte commented Mar 26, 2020

Uh oh!

aghaisas commented Mar 27, 2020

Uh oh!

arapte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

arapte Apr 1, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

kleopatra Apr 2, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

arapte Apr 2, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

arapte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2020 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

kleopatra commented Apr 3, 2020

Uh oh!

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2020

Uh oh!

arapte commented Apr 6, 2020

Uh oh!

openjdk bot commented Apr 6, 2020

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

kleopatra commented Mar 23, 2020 •

edited by openjdk bot

Loading

mlbridge bot commented Mar 23, 2020 •

edited

Loading

kevinrushforth commented Mar 23, 2020 •

edited

Loading

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2020 •

edited

Loading