-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 542
8277000: Tree-/TableRowSkin: replace listener to fixedCellSize by live lookup #1645
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8277000: Tree-/TableRowSkin: replace listener to fixedCellSize by live lookup #1645
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back mhanl! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@Maran23 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 60 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
|
||
| ListenerHelper lh = ListenerHelper.get(this); | ||
|
|
||
| lh.addChangeListener(control.indexProperty(), (ev) -> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since #1635 got merged, this is not needed as TableRowSkinBase does that already:
registerChangeListener(control.indexProperty(), e -> requestCellUpdate());. So this is basically a noop.
Webrevs
|
|
/reviewers 2 |
|
@kevinrushforth |
andy-goryachev-oracle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested with the Monkey Tester, both TreeTableView and TableView - looks good, responds to fixed cell size changes.
Left a few minor comments.
modules/javafx.controls/src/main/java/javafx/scene/control/skin/TableRowSkinBase.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/javafx.controls/src/main/java/javafx/scene/control/skin/TableRowSkinBase.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…tree-table-row-skin-live-lookup
modules/javafx.controls/src/main/java/javafx/scene/control/skin/TableRowSkinBase.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@Maran23 This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
…tree-table-row-skin-live-lookup # Conflicts: # modules/javafx.controls/src/main/java/javafx/scene/control/skin/TableRowSkin.java # modules/javafx.controls/src/main/java/javafx/scene/control/skin/TableRowSkinBase.java # modules/javafx.controls/src/main/java/javafx/scene/control/skin/TreeTableRowSkin.java
|
@Maran23 This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the |
|
Now that #1644 has been merged, should this PR be re-opened? |
|
/open
Yes! I wanted to check everything first before I reopen it. Should be good now. |
|
@Maran23 This pull request is now open |
andy-goryachev-oracle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A good improvement!
The testing on macOS 15.3.1 M1 looks good.
|
@arapte Can you be the second reviewer? |
|
@Maran23 This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
mstr2
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good and works as expected.
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit fcdccd9.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
This PR improves the
Tree-/TableRowSkincode by doing a normal live lookup for thefixedCellSizeinstead of adding listener just to update variables(fixedCellSizeEnabledandfixedCellSize) which can otherwise be also just lookup'd without the hassle of listeners.While this is mostly a cleanup, it does improve the state of the
Tree-/TableRow, as when theTableRowSkinBaseconstructor is called, the variables are not yet set.It is also consistent with the other cells, see also JDK-8246745.
Helps a bit with JDK-8185887 (#1644), but as written above, not required as there is no (visible) effect.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1645/head:pull/1645$ git checkout pull/1645Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1645$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1645/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1645View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1645Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1645.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment