Skip to content

Conversation

@nlisker
Copy link
Collaborator

@nlisker nlisker commented Jul 25, 2020

Fixes https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8246343 and some additional fixes in the vicinity.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

Reviewers

  • Kevin Rushforth (kcr - Reviewer)
  • Ajit Ghaisas (aghaisas - Reviewer)

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/274/head:pull/274
$ git checkout pull/274

@nlisker nlisker changed the base branch from master to jfx15 July 25, 2020 17:17
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 25, 2020

👋 Welcome back nlisker! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request.

@nlisker nlisker marked this pull request as ready for review July 25, 2020 17:20
@nlisker
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nlisker commented Jul 25, 2020

/reviewers 2

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Ready for review label Jul 25, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2020

@nlisker
The number of required reviews for this PR is now set to 2 (with at least 1 of role reviewers).

@kevinrushforth kevinrushforth self-requested a review July 25, 2020 17:32
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 25, 2020

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@kevinrushforth kevinrushforth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a couple quick comments for now. I'll review it next week.

/**
* Creates an VBox layout with spacing = 0.
* @param children The initial set of children for this pane.
* Creates an {@code VBox} layout with {@code spacing = 0}.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As long as you are fixing this: an VBox --> a VBox

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 27, 2020

Mailing list message from Rony G. Flatscher on openjfx-dev:

On 26.07.2020 12:10, Nir Lisker wrote:

One of the changes reads (at <https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/274/files>):

modules/javafx.fxml/src/main/docs/javafx/fxml/doc-files/introduction_to_fxml.html
<https://github.com//pull/274/files#diff-7057a6e3191138952057e494b1753773>

Viewed

@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ <h4><a id="collections_and_property_handlers">Special handlers for
collections a

<p> Collections and object properties cannot be listen to using <span class="code">setOn<span
class="variable">Event</span>()</span> methods.

For these reason, special handler methods need to be used.

<span class="code">ObservableList</span>, <span class="code">ObservableMap</span> or <span
class="code">ObservableSet</span>

uses a special <span class="code">onChange</span> attribute that points to a handler method with
a <span class="code">ListChangeListener.Change</span>, <span
class="code">MapChangeListener.Change</span> or <span
class="code">SetChangeListener.Change</span> parameter, respectively.

</p>

<pre class="code">

&lt;VBox fx:controller="com.foo.MyController"

Does anyone have FXML examples where "onChange" for ObservableList, ObservableMap and ObservableSet?
get employed?

---rony

Copy link
Member

@kevinrushforth kevinrushforth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few inline comments, but otherwise looks fine.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 27, 2020

Mailing list message from Nir Lisker on openjfx-dev:

Hi Rony,

I think that this PR is not the place for this question since it only fixes
a typo there.

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:12 PM Rony G. Flatscher <Rony.Flatscher at wu.ac.at>
wrote:

On 26.07.2020 12:10, Nir Lisker wrote:

Fixes https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8246343 and some
additional fixes in the vicinity.
Nir Lisker has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 29, 2020

@nlisker This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. When the change also fulfills all project specific requirements, type /integrate in a new comment to proceed. After integration, the commit message will be:

8246343: Fix mistakes in FX API docs

Reviewed-by: kcr, aghaisas
  • If you would like to add a summary, use the /summary command.
  • To credit additional contributors, use the /contributor command.
  • To add additional solved issues, use the /issue command.

Since the source branch of this PR was last updated there has been 1 commit pushed to the jfx15 branch:

  • fc38ce6: 8249647: Many classes in package javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base have implicit no-arg constructors

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid automatic rebasing, please merge jfx15 into your branch, and then specify the current head hash when integrating, like this: /integrate fc38ce64ecd104625273a1950fe0a2e9b4db1e56.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the jfx15 branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Ready to be integrated label Jul 29, 2020
@nlisker
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nlisker commented Jul 29, 2020

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 29, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Ready to be integrated labels Jul 29, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 29, 2020

@nlisker The following commits have been pushed to jfx15 since your change was applied:

  • fc38ce6: 8249647: Many classes in package javafx.beans.binding in module javafx.base have implicit no-arg constructors

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 487854c.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Ready for review label Jul 29, 2020
@nlisker nlisker deleted the 8246343_Fix_mistakes_in_FX_API_docs branch October 21, 2020 22:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants