Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8260163: IrresponsiveScriptTest.testInfiniteLoopInScript unit test fails on Windows #391

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

arun-joseph
Copy link
Member

@arun-joseph arun-joseph commented Feb 1, 2021

Windows uses WorkQueueGeneric instead of WorkQueueWin from WebKit 610.2 onwards. In WorkQueueWin, WorkQueue::dispatchAfter() had a 20 ms slopAdjustment as the timer (called from ::SetTimer) sometimes fire a few ms early. The same is not present in WorkQueueGeneric and needs to be added.

Also removing WorkQueueWin as it's removed for WebKit as well.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8260163: IrresponsiveScriptTest.testInfiniteLoopInScript unit test fails on Windows

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/391/head:pull/391
$ git checkout pull/391

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 1, 2021

👋 Welcome back ajoseph! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Ready for review label Feb 1, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 1, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@kevinrushforth kevinrushforth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fix and the test look good with one question and one doc comment.

Copy link
Member

@kevinrushforth kevinrushforth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 1, 2021

@arun-joseph This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8260163: IrresponsiveScriptTest.testInfiniteLoopInScript unit test fails on Windows

Reviewed-by: kcr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 217a8cb: 8259680: Need API to query states of CAPS LOCK and NUM LOCK keys
  • db6941d: 8256283: IndexOutOfBoundsException when sorting a TreeTableView

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Ready to be integrated label Feb 1, 2021
@arun-joseph
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 2, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Ready to be integrated rfr Ready for review labels Feb 2, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 2, 2021

@arun-joseph Since your change was applied there have been 2 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 217a8cb: 8259680: Need API to query states of CAPS LOCK and NUM LOCK keys
  • db6941d: 8256283: IndexOutOfBoundsException when sorting a TreeTableView

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit e481f8c.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@arun-joseph arun-joseph deleted the 8260163 branch February 2, 2021 02:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants