Skip to content

8269081: Tree/ListViewSkin: must remove flow on dispose #612

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kleopatra
Copy link
Collaborator

@kleopatra kleopatra commented Aug 27, 2021

left-over issue from cleanup of Tree/ListViewSkin: direct children that have been added by the skin must be removed in dispose

fixed by removing the flow (which allowed to revert the previous cleanup of event handlers/cellfactory)

added tests to verify

  • constant child count after replacing skin
  • no memory leak when switching skin while showing

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8269081: Tree/ListViewSkin: must remove flow on dispose

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/612/head:pull/612
$ git checkout pull/612

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/612
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/612/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 612

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 612

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/612.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 27, 2021

👋 Welcome back fastegal! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@kleopatra kleopatra changed the title 826908: Tree/ListViewSkin: must remove flow on dispose 8269081: Tree/ListViewSkin: must remove flow on dispose Aug 27, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Ready for review label Aug 27, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 27, 2021

Webrevs

@kevinrushforth kevinrushforth requested a review from arapte August 27, 2021 13:35
Copy link
Member

@arapte arapte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 2, 2021

@kleopatra This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8269081: Tree/ListViewSkin: must remove flow on dispose

Reviewed-by: arapte

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Ready to be integrated label Sep 2, 2021
@kleopatra
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 2, 2021

Going to push as commit e931501.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 2, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Ready to be integrated rfr Ready for review labels Sep 2, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 2, 2021

@kleopatra Pushed as commit e931501.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@kleopatra kleopatra deleted the bug-fix-8269081 branch September 2, 2021 11:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants