Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8289751: Multiple unit test failures after JDK-8251483 #811

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Maran23
Copy link
Member

@Maran23 Maran23 commented Jul 5, 2022

As also discussed in the ticket, we need to disable/ignore this two tests for now.

With the fix for JDK-8251483 the table row item is never null in a non empty table cell.
In the meantime with JDK-8251480 and JDK-8285197 we changed the table column header autosizing to be more complete by adding the table row to the setup.
Unfortunately we don't set the table view for the table row, therefore it can not know the underlying item (he knows the index but not where he can get the corresponding data for that index) -> table row item can be null in a non empty table cell (again).

This will be fixed in #805 (and the tests can be reenabled)


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8289751: Multiple unit test failures after JDK-8251483

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx pull/811/head:pull/811
$ git checkout pull/811

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/811
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jfx pull/811/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 811

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 811

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/811.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 5, 2022

👋 Welcome back mhanl! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Ready for review label Jul 5, 2022
@kevinrushforth kevinrushforth self-requested a review July 5, 2022 23:15
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 5, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@kevinrushforth kevinrushforth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I confirm that all tests pass after this. As discussed in the JBS issue, we might want to file a follow-on issue to investigate the cascading failures caused when these two tests fail.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 5, 2022

@Maran23 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8289751: Multiple unit test failures after JDK-8251483

Reviewed-by: kcr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@kevinrushforth) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Ready to be integrated label Jul 5, 2022
@kevinrushforth
Copy link
Member

Thank you for fixing this quickly.

@Maran23
Copy link
Member Author

Maran23 commented Jul 5, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Ready to sponsor label Jul 5, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 5, 2022

@Maran23
Your change (at version 952dbb4) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@kevinrushforth
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 5, 2022

Going to push as commit b9f3907.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 5, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 5, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Ready to be integrated rfr Ready for review sponsor Ready to sponsor labels Jul 5, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 5, 2022

@kevinrushforth @Maran23 Pushed as commit b9f3907.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@Maran23
Copy link
Member Author

Maran23 commented Jul 5, 2022

Thank you for fixing this quickly.

Thank you very much for your time as well! I am glad that I could help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants