-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 488
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8297130: ComboBox popup doesn't close after selecting value that was added with 'runLater' #956
Conversation
👋 Welcome back mstrauss! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
/reviewers 2 |
Reviewers: @aghaisas @andy-goryachev-oracle |
@kevinrushforth |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no ill effects observed with several test applications.
incidentally, this change has no effect on JDK-8292933 dual focus issue.
while (node != null) { | ||
node.focused.set(false); | ||
node.focusVisible.set(false); | ||
while (node != null && !node.focused.get()) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there a reason not to use isFocused() ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this area of the code, the eagerly initialized fields focused
, focusVisible
and focusWithin
are used directly. Other than that, there's no reason. If you prefer the convenience getters, I can change it.
@@ -8239,7 +8240,7 @@ public void set(boolean value) { | |||
do { | |||
node.focusWithin.set(value); | |||
node = node.getParent(); | |||
} while (node != null); | |||
} while (node != null && !node.focused.get()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
isFocused() ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fix looks good to me!
@mstr2 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 17 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 4a697f1.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Do you plan to add this fix to the version 19, of Java FX? |
This PR fixes a bug where multi-level focus is not correctly preserved.
The original implementation incorrectly assumed that there can only be a single focused node in the scene graph, which is not the case when a branch of the scene graph is presented by a
PopupWindow
. More specifically, when a focused node was removed from the scene graph, the focus flags of all parents were incorrectly cleared. The correct implementation only clears thefocusWithin
flag of parents (but notfocused
orfocusVisible
), and stops when another focused node is encountered along the way.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx pull/956/head:pull/956
$ git checkout pull/956
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/956
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jfx pull/956/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 956
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 956
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/956.diff