Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

6967: Add Percentage Column w.r.t 'Profiling Samples' in Thread table #260

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

guruhb
Copy link
Contributor

@guruhb guruhb commented Jun 9, 2021

Adding "Percentage" column in Thread table (JavaApplication View). which is helpful in knowing the ratio w.r.t "Profiling Samples"
JMC 5.x had the Percentage Column in "Hot threads" tab.


Progress

  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JMC-6967: Add Percentage Column w.r.t 'Profiling Samples' in Thread table

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmc pull/260/head:pull/260
$ git checkout pull/260

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/260
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmc pull/260/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 260

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 260

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmc/pull/260.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 9, 2021

👋 Welcome back ghb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@guruhb guruhb changed the title Add Percentage Column w.r.t 'Profiling Samples' in Thread table 6967: Add Percentage Column w.r.t 'Profiling Samples' in Thread table Jun 9, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr label Jun 9, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 9, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@aptmac aptmac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The column looks good to me, I did have a question about whether or not the strings should be externalized or not.

@@ -205,6 +206,8 @@ public Color getColor(IQuantity balance) {
return null;
}, Messages.JavaApplicationPage_COLUMN_THREAD_DURATION,
Messages.JavaApplicationPage_COLUMN_THREAD_DURATION_DESC);
HISTOGRAM.addPercentageColumn(PROFILING_PERCENTAGE_COL, JdkAggregators.EXECUTION_SAMPLE_COUNT, "Percentage",
"Percentage over total Profiling samples");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks to be the only instance in the class that uses non-externalized strings, should these be put into Messages.java?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should have been externalised, Its fixed now, Please re-check and update your comments.

Copy link
Collaborator

@bric3 bric3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same remark as @aptmac .
Looks good otherwise.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 21, 2021

@guruhb This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

6967: Add Percentage Column w.r.t 'Profiling Samples' in Thread table

Reviewed-by: aptmac

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 8 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 6723a70: 7299: Accessibility Issue - Too low contrast on rule result values
  • 8bc1247: 7272: Method profiling page should show the frame type
  • a2995a1: 7264: Improve the performance of the JFR parser
  • 8e2988e: 7268: Show icons for modifiers in the method profiling page
  • d622dd3: 7267: Change artifact id from "org.openjdk.jmc.agent" to "agent"
  • ad54a32: 7266: Context Switch event handling breaks if JMC has old and new types parsed simultaneously
  • a5f81b7: 7266: Context Switch event handling breaks if JMC has old and new types parsed simultaneously
  • df466e7: 6923: Retain treeview stack trace while switching between JFRs

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready label Jun 21, 2021
@guruhb
Copy link
Contributor Author

guruhb commented Jun 21, 2021

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 21, 2021

Going to push as commit 7f38790.
Since your change was applied there have been 8 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 6723a70: 7299: Accessibility Issue - Too low contrast on rule result values
  • 8bc1247: 7272: Method profiling page should show the frame type
  • a2995a1: 7264: Improve the performance of the JFR parser
  • 8e2988e: 7268: Show icons for modifiers in the method profiling page
  • d622dd3: 7267: Change artifact id from "org.openjdk.jmc.agent" to "agent"
  • ad54a32: 7266: Context Switch event handling breaks if JMC has old and new types parsed simultaneously
  • a5f81b7: 7266: Context Switch event handling breaks if JMC has old and new types parsed simultaneously
  • df466e7: 6923: Retain treeview stack trace while switching between JFRs

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 21, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated and removed ready rfr labels Jun 21, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 21, 2021

@guruhb Pushed as commit 7f38790.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants