Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

7480: Trim method descriptor value #343

Closed

Conversation

gunnarmorling
Copy link
Contributor

@gunnarmorling gunnarmorling commented Dec 18, 2021

Hey @thegreystone, here's a fix for trimming the method signature value when building the method descriptors in the agent. Without this, wrapping the tags around long signatures like that will fail:

 <descriptor>
   (Ljava/sql/PreparedStatement;Ljava/lang/Object;ILorg/hibernate/type/descriptor/WrapperOptions;)V
</descriptor>

Could you log an issue if you think it's a worthwhile fix? The second commit is some unrelated clean-up I did along the way. Thx!


Progress

  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JMC-7480: Trim method descriptor value

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmc pull/343/head:pull/343
$ git checkout pull/343

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/343
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmc pull/343/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 343

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 343

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmc/pull/343.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 18, 2021

👋 Welcome back gunnarmorling! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@thegreystone thegreystone changed the title Trimming descriptor 7480: Trim method descriptor value Dec 19, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr label Dec 19, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 19, 2021

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 19, 2021

@gunnarmorling This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

7480: Trim method descriptor value

Reviewed-by: hirt

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@thegreystone) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready label Dec 19, 2021
@gunnarmorling
Copy link
Contributor Author

@thegreystone thx for logging 7480. Reworded the commit messages accordingly.

@gunnarmorling
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor label Dec 21, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 21, 2021

@gunnarmorling
Your change (at version 9243d98) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@thegreystone
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 21, 2021

Going to push as commit 1c6ccc9.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 21, 2021

@thegreystone @gunnarmorling Pushed as commit 1c6ccc9.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants