Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8319724: [Lilliput] ParallelGC: Forwarded objects found during heap inspection #62

Closed

Conversation

rkennke
Copy link
Collaborator

@rkennke rkennke commented Nov 9, 2023

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit 0568386e from the openjdk/lilliput repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Roman Kennke on 9 Nov 2023 and was reviewed by Aleksey Shipilev.

Thanks!


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8319724: [Lilliput] ParallelGC: Forwarded objects found during heap inspection (Bug - P2)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput-jdk17u.git pull/62/head:pull/62
$ git checkout pull/62

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/62
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput-jdk17u.git pull/62/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 62

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 62

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput-jdk17u/pull/62.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 9, 2023

👋 Welcome back rkennke! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into lilliput will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 0568386e062474b1fc31e2e7106db0079ded7d76 8319724: [Lilliput] ParallelGC: Forwarded objects found during heap inspection Nov 9, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 9, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 9, 2023

@rkennke This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8319724: [Lilliput] ParallelGC: Forwarded objects found during heap inspection

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the lilliput branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the lilliput branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 9, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 9, 2023

Webrevs

@rkennke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rkennke commented Nov 9, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 9, 2023

Going to push as commit 28fc5f2.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 9, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 9, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 9, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 9, 2023

@rkennke Pushed as commit 28fc5f2.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant