Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8318895: Deoptimization results in incorrect lightweight locking stack #77

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rkennke
Copy link
Collaborator

@rkennke rkennke commented Apr 9, 2024

Backport of openjdk/jdk@ea1ffa3

Fixes a bug related to lightweight locking and deoptimization.

Mostly clean, except for minor context diff in includes and missing -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions in tests.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Committer)

Issue

  • JDK-8318895: Deoptimization results in incorrect lightweight locking stack (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput-jdk17u.git pull/77/head:pull/77
$ git checkout pull/77

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/77
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput-jdk17u.git pull/77/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 77

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 77

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput-jdk17u/pull/77.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Co-authored-by: Axel Boldt-Christmas <aboldtch@openjdk.org>
Co-authored-by: Richard Reingruber <rrich@openjdk.org>
Reviewed-by: dlong, rrich
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 9, 2024

👋 Welcome back rkennke! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into lilliput will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 9, 2024

@rkennke This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8318895: Deoptimization results in incorrect lightweight locking stack

Reviewed-by: shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the lilliput branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the lilliput branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport ea1ffa34192448317ce9a61a3588b0dee3a2ef44 8318895: Deoptimization results in incorrect lightweight locking stack Apr 9, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 9, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 9, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 9, 2024

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 9, 2024
@rkennke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rkennke commented Apr 9, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 9, 2024

Going to push as commit 17daee8.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 9, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 9, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 9, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 9, 2024

@rkennke Pushed as commit 17daee8.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants