Skip to content

8326761: Lilliput: OMWorld: Fix invalid markWord transition #138

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

xmas92
Copy link
Member

@xmas92 xmas92 commented Feb 27, 2024

PlaceholderSynchronizer::inflate_and_enter currently performs an invalid transition of the markWord away from monitor. This may lead to an ABA issue.

This got opportunistically added at some point to avoid spinning on the deflation thread progress. The issue of guaranteed progress is not something that has been observed as an issue. If guaranteed progress turns out to be required there are solutions which do not have ABA issues, but it requires extra state in the already heavily contested markWord.

The yielding and spinning will be evaluated in a separate issue.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8326761: Lilliput: OMWorld: Fix invalid markWord transition (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput.git pull/138/head:pull/138
$ git checkout pull/138

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/138
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput.git pull/138/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 138

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 138

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput/pull/138.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 27, 2024

👋 Welcome back aboldtch! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into omworld-jdk will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 27, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Collaborator

@rkennke rkennke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Thanks!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 27, 2024

@xmas92 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8326761: Lilliput: OMWorld: Fix invalid markWord transition

Reviewed-by: rkennke

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the omworld-jdk branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the omworld-jdk branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 27, 2024
@xmas92
Copy link
Member Author

xmas92 commented Feb 27, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Going to push as commit ff713d9.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 27, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 27, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 27, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 27, 2024

@xmas92 Pushed as commit ff713d9.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants