Skip to content

8326752: Lilliput: OMCache: Add cache lookup unrolling #139

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

xmas92
Copy link
Member

@xmas92 xmas92 commented Feb 27, 2024

Implement unrolling of OM cache lookups in C2 so experiments and an evaluation can be performed.

Adds OMC2UnrollCacheLookup, OMC2UnrollCacheLookupLoopTail and OMC2UnrollCacheEntires flags which can be tuned cache lookup unrolling in C2.

OMC2UnrollCacheLookup will unroll up to OMC2UnrollCacheEntires (depending on OMCacheSize) and if OMC2UnrollCacheLookupLoopTail is set and entries are left the rest of the cache will be checked.

All of these flags are temporary to allow for evaluation of the cache lookup in C2 (size and unrolling). See issue JDK-8326759


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8326752: Lilliput: OMCache: Add cache lookup unrolling (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput.git pull/139/head:pull/139
$ git checkout pull/139

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/139
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput.git pull/139/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 139

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 139

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput/pull/139.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 27, 2024

👋 Welcome back aboldtch! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into omworld-jdk will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 27, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2024
3 tasks
Copy link
Collaborator

@rkennke rkennke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Axel, only some minor nits.

\
product(bool, OMC2UnrollCacheLookupLoopTail, true, "") \
\
product(int, OMC2UnrollCacheEntires, 8, "") \
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a typo: Entires -> Entries

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, could perhaps collapse some flags, e.g. treat OMC2UnrollCacheEntries==0 as OMC2UnrollCacheLookup==false, and get rid of the latter.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was intentional, because I like+ vs - switching. But maybe unifying them is better so someone does not get confused if they see -XX:-OMC2UnrollCache -XX:OMC2UnrollCacheEntries=4 as an argument.
I'll change it.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rkennke rkennke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Thank you!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 27, 2024

@xmas92 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8326752: Lilliput: OMCache: Add cache lookup unrolling

Reviewed-by: rkennke

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the omworld-jdk branch:

  • ff713d9: 8326761: Lilliput: OMWorld: Fix invalid markWord transition

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the omworld-jdk branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the omworld-jdk branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 27, 2024
@xmas92
Copy link
Member Author

xmas92 commented Feb 27, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Going to push as commit 28bb8dd.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the omworld-jdk branch:

  • ff713d9: 8326761: Lilliput: OMWorld: Fix invalid markWord transition

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 27, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 27, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 27, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 27, 2024

@xmas92 Pushed as commit 28bb8dd.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants