Skip to content

8282235: jextract crashes when a Java keyword is used in as a function pointer typedef parameter name #653

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

sundararajana
Copy link
Member

@sundararajana sundararajana commented Feb 22, 2022

Missed transforming function typedef parameter names as java safe identifiers.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8282235: jextract crashes when a Java keyword is used in as a function pointer typedef parameter name

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/panama-foreign pull/653/head:pull/653
$ git checkout pull/653

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/653
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/panama-foreign pull/653/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 653

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 653

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/panama-foreign/pull/653.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 22, 2022

👋 Welcome back sundar! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into foreign-jextract will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Ready for review label Feb 22, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 22, 2022

Webrevs

@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ private String parameterName(int i) {
if (parameterNames.isPresent()) {
name = parameterNames.get().get(i);
}
return name.isEmpty()? "_x" + i : name;
return name.isEmpty()? "_x" + i : Utils.javaSafeIdentifier(name);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we do this for regular native functions?

e.g.

int foo(int abstract);

Copy link
Member Author

@sundararajana sundararajana Feb 22, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We already call Utils.javaSafeIdentifier() elsewhere. So this is already taken care of (8261893)

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for the explanation

Copy link
Collaborator

@mcimadamore mcimadamore left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 22, 2022

@sundararajana This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8282235: jextract crashes when a Java keyword is used in as a function pointer typedef parameter name

Reviewed-by: mcimadamore

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the foreign-jextract branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the foreign-jextract branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Ready to be integrated label Feb 22, 2022
@sundararajana
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 22, 2022

Going to push as commit 11efb79.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 22, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 22, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Ready to be integrated rfr Ready for review labels Feb 22, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 22, 2022

@sundararajana Pushed as commit 11efb79.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@sundararajana sundararajana deleted the JDK-8282235 branch February 22, 2022 18:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants