openjdk / panama-vector Public
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8266720: Wrong implementation in LibraryCallKit::inline_vector_shuffle_iota #81
base: vectorIntrinsics
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ | ||
/* | ||
* Copyright (c) 2021, Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. | ||
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. | ||
* | ||
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it | ||
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as | ||
* published by the Free Software Foundation. | ||
* | ||
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT | ||
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or | ||
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License | ||
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that | ||
* accompanied this code). | ||
* | ||
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version | ||
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, | ||
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. | ||
* | ||
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA | ||
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any | ||
* questions. | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
package compiler.vectorapi; | ||
|
||
import jdk.incubator.vector.ByteVector; | ||
import jdk.incubator.vector.VectorSpecies; | ||
import jdk.incubator.vector.VectorShuffle; | ||
|
||
import org.testng.Assert; | ||
import org.testng.annotations.Test; | ||
|
||
|
||
/* | ||
* @test | ||
* @bug 8266720 | ||
* @modules jdk.incubator.vector | ||
* @run testng/othervm compiler.vectorapi.TestVectorShuffleIotaByte1024 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Perhaps the test can be annotated, declaring it should only execute on ARM/SVE platforms. See the use of the There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thank you for you review. I think this test is used for any arch which has There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. But we know which arches don't support, x86, PPC etc. I am unsure why existing shuffle tests do not catch this problem. In fact i would prefer we focus on that if we can rather than adding a specific test. Would you mind looking to see if see if we can expand on the existing There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
||
*/ | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public class TestVectorShuffleIotaByte1024 { | ||
static final VectorSpecies<Byte> SPECIESb_1024 = ByteVector.SPECIES_MAX; | ||
|
||
static final int INVOC_COUNT = Integer.getInteger("jdk.incubator.vector.test.loop-iterations", 50000); | ||
|
||
static final byte[] ab_1024 = {50, 49, 47, 53, 47, 49, 50, 48, 50, 32, 46, 116, 105, 32, 115, | ||
110, 101, 104, 116, 103, 110, 101, 114, 116, 115, 32, 101, | ||
99, 110, 101, 115, 101, 114, 112, 44, 101, 118, 111, 108, | ||
32, 115, 110, 101, 112, 114, 97, 104, 115, 32, 101, 99, 110, | ||
101, 115, 98, 65, 46, 117, 111, 121, 32, 101, 118, 111, 108, | ||
32, 73, 46, 103, 110, 97, 117, 72, 32, 71, 78, 65, 87, 45, 45, | ||
33, 117, 111, 121, 32, 103, 110, 105, 115, 115, 105, 77, 46, 117, | ||
111, 121, 32, 111, 116, 32, 114, 101, 116, 116, 101, 108, 32, | ||
104, 116, 52, 32, 121, 109, 32, 115, 105, 32, 115, 105, 104, 116, | ||
44, 121, 116, 101, 101, 119, 83}; | ||
|
||
static final byte[] expected_1024 = {0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, | ||
51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81, 84, 87, 90, 93, 96, | ||
99, 102, 105, 108, 111, 114, 117, 120, 123, 126, -127, -124, | ||
-121, -118, -115, -112, -109, -106, -103, -100, -97, -94, -91, | ||
-88, -85, -82, -79, -76, -73, -70, -67, -64, -61, -58, -55, -52, | ||
-49, -46, -43, -40, -37, -34, -31, -28, -25, -22, -19, -16, -13, | ||
-10, -7, -4, -1, -126, -123, -120, -117, -114, -111, -108, -105, | ||
-102, -99, -96, -93, -90, -87, -84, -81, -78, -75, -72, -69, -66, | ||
-63, -60, -57, -54, -51, -48, -45, -42, -39, -36, -33, -30, -27, | ||
-24, -21, -18, -15, -12, -9, -6, -3}; | ||
|
||
static void testShuffleIota_1024() { | ||
ByteVector bv = (ByteVector) VectorShuffle.iota(SPECIESb_1024, 0, 3, false).toVector(); | ||
bv4.intoArray(ab_1024, 0); | ||
} | ||
|
||
static void testIota_1024() { | ||
for (int ic = 0; ic < INVOC_COUNT; ic++) { | ||
testShuffleIota_1024(); | ||
} | ||
Assert.assertEquals(ab_1024, expected_1024); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
static void testIota() { | ||
if (SPECESb_1024.length() == 1024) { | ||
testIota_1024(); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it need any vector length check or block for vector length >1024?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your review. It is a problem here. I will do that in next commit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As discussed with @nsjian , can we currently make it unsupported as well for 1024-bits? It doesn't need to change any IR if 1024-bits is not supported. We can revisit this issue in future for vector length >= 1024-bits