Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1004: Skara bots fail to parse openjfx11.0.12 version #1142

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

erikj79
Copy link
Member

@erikj79 erikj79 commented Apr 29, 2021

This patch adds the ability to parse prefixes for JEP322 versions in JBS. One typical such prefix is openjfx, but I chose to not enumerate valid ones here but instead accept any prefix matching [a-z]+.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • SKARA-1004: Skara bots fail to parse openjfx11.0.12 version

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/skara pull/1142/head:pull/1142
$ git checkout pull/1142

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1142
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/skara pull/1142/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1142

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1142

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/skara/pull/1142.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 29, 2021

👋 Welcome back erikj! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title SKARA-1004 1004: Skara bots fail to parse openjfx11.0.12 version Apr 29, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr label Apr 29, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 29, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@rwestberg rwestberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 29, 2021

@erikj79 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

🔍 One or more changes in this pull request modifies files in areas of the source code that often require two reviewers. Please consider if this is the case for this pull request, and if so, await a second reviewer to approve this pull request before you integrate it.

🌎 Applicable reviewers for one or more changes in this pull request are spread across multiple different time zones. Please consider waiting with integrating this pull request until it has been out for review for at least 24 hours to give all reviewers a chance to review the pull request.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

1004: Skara bots fail to parse openjfx11.0.12 version

Reviewed-by: rwestberg, tbell

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@kevinrushforth
Copy link
Member

This should work. With this fix, is fxVersionPattern needed any longer? That could be explored in a follow-on fix if it is obsolete after this fix.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready label Apr 29, 2021
@rwestberg
Copy link
Member

This should work. With this fix, is fxVersionPattern needed any longer? That could be explored in a follow-on fix if it is obsolete after this fix.

It will still be needed for versions that contain an 'u' I guess, so depends on whether you use jdk8-style versions (8u297 etc) or not.

@erikj79
Copy link
Member Author

erikj79 commented Apr 29, 2021

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 29, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated and removed ready rfr labels Apr 29, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 29, 2021

@erikj79 Pushed as commit d27723d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
4 participants