Skip to content

Conversation

@coleenp
Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp commented Nov 5, 2025

Reordered the conditionals so that unresolved static final fields do not have their resolution set during so that their strictness can be validated (write before read, no write after read).

This should work with JDK-8334898 when merged because this change will not fill in the cpCache for statics if they're strict final statics:

Tested with tier1-4 (in progress). Tested command line the cds test that failed and valhalla/inlinetypes tests.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace

Issue

  • JDK-8370886: [lworld] 8369296 partially reverted for resolving static get/put field (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1723/head:pull/1723
$ git checkout pull/1723

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1723
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1723/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1723

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1723

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1723.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 5, 2025

👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into lworld will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 5, 2025

@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8370886: [lworld] 8369296 partially reverted for resolving static get/put field

Reviewed-by: matsaave

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 102 new commits pushed to the lworld branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the lworld branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@coleenp coleenp marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2025 17:01
@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 10, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 10, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@matias9927 matias9927 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@coleenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

coleenp commented Nov 10, 2025

Thanks for the review Matias.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 10, 2025

Going to push as commit a680c71.
Since your change was applied there have been 102 commits pushed to the lworld branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 10, 2025

@coleenp Pushed as commit a680c71.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@coleenp coleenp deleted the getput branch November 10, 2025 20:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants