[REVIEW]: Overlapping: a R package for Estimating Overlapping in Empirical Distributions #1023

whedon · 2018-10-15T17:19:32Z

Submitting author: @masspastore (MASSIMILIANO PASTORE)
Repository: https://github.com/masspastore/overlapping
Version: v1.5.0
Editor: @arfon
Reviewer: @soodoku, @russellpierce
Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.1920397

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="http://joss.theoj.org/papers/05da34b6ecffbbb8f8be61362989a757"><img src="http://joss.theoj.org/papers/05da34b6ecffbbb8f8be61362989a757/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](http://joss.theoj.org/papers/05da34b6ecffbbb8f8be61362989a757/status.svg)](http://joss.theoj.org/papers/05da34b6ecffbbb8f8be61362989a757)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@soodoku & @russellpierce, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:

Make sure you're logged in to your GitHub account
Be sure to accept the invite at this URL: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/invitations

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.theoj.org/about#reviewer_guidelines. Any questions/concerns please let @leeper know.

✨ Please try and complete your review in the next two weeks ✨

Review checklist for @soodoku

Conflict of interest

As the reviewer I confirm that I have read the JOSS conflict of interest policy and that there are no conflicts of interest for me to review this work.

Code of Conduct

I confirm that I read and will adhere to the JOSS code of conduct.

General checks

Repository: Is the source code for this software available at the repository url?
License: Does the repository contain a plain-text LICENSE file with the contents of an OSI approved software license?
Version: Does the release version given match the GitHub release (v1.5.0)?
Authorship: Has the submitting author (@https://github.com/masspastore) made major contributions to the software? Does the full list of paper authors seem appropriate and complete?

Functionality

Installation: Does installation proceed as outlined in the documentation?
Functionality: Have the functional claims of the software been confirmed?
Performance: If there are any performance claims of the software, have they been confirmed? (If there are no claims, please check off this item.)

Documentation

A statement of need: Do the authors clearly state what problems the software is designed to solve and who the target audience is?
Installation instructions: Is there a clearly-stated list of dependencies? Ideally these should be handled with an automated package management solution.
Example usage: Do the authors include examples of how to use the software (ideally to solve real-world analysis problems).
Functionality documentation: Is the core functionality of the software documented to a satisfactory level (e.g., API method documentation)?
Automated tests: Are there automated tests or manual steps described so that the function of the software can be verified?
Community guidelines: Are there clear guidelines for third parties wishing to 1) Contribute to the software 2) Report issues or problems with the software 3) Seek support

Software paper

Authors: Does the paper.md file include a list of authors with their affiliations?
A statement of need: Do the authors clearly state what problems the software is designed to solve and who the target audience is?
References: Do all archival references that should have a DOI list one (e.g., papers, datasets, software)?

Review checklist for @russellpierce

Conflict of interest

As the reviewer I confirm that I have read the JOSS conflict of interest policy and that there are no conflicts of interest for me to review this work.

Code of Conduct

I confirm that I read and will adhere to the JOSS code of conduct.

General checks

Repository: Is the source code for this software available at the repository url?
License: Does the repository contain a plain-text LICENSE file with the contents of an OSI approved software license?
Version: Does the release version given match the GitHub release (v1.5.0)?
Authorship: Has the submitting author (@https://github.com/masspastore) made major contributions to the software? Does the full list of paper authors seem appropriate and complete?

Functionality

Installation: Does installation proceed as outlined in the documentation?
Functionality: Have the functional claims of the software been confirmed?
Performance: If there are any performance claims of the software, have they been confirmed? (If there are no claims, please check off this item.)

Documentation

A statement of need: Do the authors clearly state what problems the software is designed to solve and who the target audience is?
Installation instructions: Is there a clearly-stated list of dependencies? Ideally these should be handled with an automated package management solution.
Example usage: Do the authors include examples of how to use the software (ideally to solve real-world analysis problems).
Functionality documentation: Is the core functionality of the software documented to a satisfactory level (e.g., API method documentation)?
Automated tests: Are there automated tests or manual steps described so that the function of the software can be verified?
Community guidelines: Are there clear guidelines for third parties wishing to 1) Contribute to the software 2) Report issues or problems with the software 3) Seek support

Software paper

Authors: Does the paper.md file include a list of authors with their affiliations?
A statement of need: Do the authors clearly state what problems the software is designed to solve and who the target audience is?
References: Do all archival references that should have a DOI list one (e.g., papers, datasets, software)?

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

whedon · 2018-10-15T17:19:35Z

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @soodoku, it looks like you're currently assigned as the reviewer for this paper 🎉.

⭐ Important ⭐

If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews 😿

To fix this do the following two things:

Set yourself as 'Not watching' https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews:

You may also like to change your default settings for this watching repositories in your GitHub profile here: https://github.com/settings/notifications

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

whedon · 2018-10-15T17:19:35Z

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

whedon · 2018-10-15T17:20:05Z

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

arfon · 2018-10-15T17:20:31Z

@soodoku, @russellpierce - please carry out your reviews in this issue by updating the checklist above and giving feedback in this issue. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

Any questions/concerns please let me know.

russellpierce · 2018-10-15T20:52:59Z

@masspator Nice to meet you. I've added several issues to your repo to cover items that I believe are in this checklist. Rather than giving you a lot of extra feedback at this time, I'll pause there and wait to see if that feedback seems useful. :)

masspastore · 2018-10-25T12:46:13Z

@whedon commands

whedon · 2018-10-25T12:46:19Z

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

🚧 🚧 🚧 Experimental Whedon features 🚧 🚧 🚧

# Compile the paper from a custom git branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

masspastore · 2018-10-25T12:46:44Z

@whedon generate pdf

whedon · 2018-10-25T12:46:48Z

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

whedon · 2018-10-25T12:46:57Z

PDF failed to compile for issue #1023 with the following error:

/app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/psych.rb:377:in parse': (tmp/1023/paper/paper.md): control characters are not allowed at line 1 column 1 (Psych::SyntaxError) from /app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/psych.rb:377:in parse_stream'
from /app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/psych.rb:325:in parse' from /app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/psych.rb:252:in load'
from /app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/psych.rb:473:in block in load_file' from /app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/psych.rb:472:in open'
from /app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/psych.rb:472:in load_file' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon.rb:68:in initialize'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon/processor.rb:32:in new' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon/processor.rb:32:in set_paper'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/bin/whedon:52:in prepare' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in run'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in invoke_command' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor.rb:387:in dispatch'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in start' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/bin/whedon:113:in <top (required)>'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in load' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in

'

masspastore · 2018-10-25T12:50:35Z

@whedon generate pdf

whedon · 2018-10-25T12:50:38Z

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

whedon · 2018-10-25T12:50:46Z

PDF failed to compile for issue #1023 with the following error:

/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon/author.rb:23:in strip_footnotes': undefined method []' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError)
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon/author.rb:13:in initialize' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon.rb:109:in new'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon.rb:109:in block in parse_authors' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon.rb:106:in each'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon.rb:106:in parse_authors' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon.rb:73:in initialize'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon/processor.rb:32:in new' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon/processor.rb:32:in set_paper'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/bin/whedon:52:in prepare' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in run'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in invoke_command' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor.rb:387:in dispatch'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in start' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/bin/whedon:113:in <top (required)>'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in load' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in

'

arfon · 2018-10-25T16:19:10Z

@masspastore - please update your paper YAML header to exactly match the format of this example: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#example-paper-and-bibliography

Please note that YAML is whitespace sensitive.

masspastore · 2018-10-26T09:20:52Z

Thanks @arfon

I unfortunately added a new reference in the bib file without checking it.
I updated the bib and the paper files, now I think it is correct.

ooo · 2018-10-26T09:20:53Z

👋 Hey @masspastore...

Letting you know, @arfon is currently OOO until Monday, October 29th 2018. ❤️

masspastore · 2018-10-26T09:52:27Z

@whedon generate pdf

whedon · 2018-10-26T09:52:29Z

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

whedon · 2018-10-26T09:52:42Z

PDF failed to compile for issue #1023 with the following error:

/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon/author.rb:23:in strip_footnotes': undefined method []' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError)
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon/author.rb:13:in initialize' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon.rb:109:in new'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon.rb:109:in block in parse_authors' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon.rb:106:in each'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon.rb:106:in parse_authors' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon.rb:73:in initialize'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon/processor.rb:32:in new' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/lib/whedon/processor.rb:32:in set_paper'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/bin/whedon:52:in prepare' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in run'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in invoke_command' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor.rb:387:in dispatch'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in start' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-8e8528b72684/bin/whedon:113:in <top (required)>'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in load' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in

'

arfon · 2018-10-26T10:22:32Z

I updated the bib and the paper files, now I think it is correct.

No, I'm afraid the issue is with the YAML header of your paper. Please update your paper YAML header to match the format of this example: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#example-paper-and-bibliography

masspastore · 2018-10-27T08:28:06Z

@whedon generate pdf

masspastore · 2018-10-27T08:32:23Z

Thanks @arfon

I updated the YAML header as of your suggestion.
I checked it in my computer and it works, I hope now it's fine.

ooo · 2018-10-27T08:32:24Z

👋 Hey @masspastore...

Letting you know, @arfon is currently OOO until Monday, October 29th 2018. ❤️

arfon · 2018-10-27T11:11:52Z

@masspastore - please merge this PR too: masspastore/overlapping#9

arfon · 2018-10-29T11:16:52Z

@whedon generate pdf

whedon · 2018-10-29T11:16:54Z

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

whedon · 2018-10-29T11:17:22Z

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

arfon · 2018-11-29T11:35:49Z

@soodoku - it looks like there are a few checkboxes un-checked for your review. Is there still work to be done by the author or are you happy to accept here?

soodoku · 2018-11-29T14:20:20Z

@arfon: need to check a couple of things. i plan to get to it over the weekend. i will be in touch soonish.

russellpierce · 2018-11-30T17:13:10Z

@soodoku thanks for giving it a thorough look. I'll admit that I've been through it enough at this point where I don't have as clear as view on the end result as I might have at the start. So, it is entirely possible I'm missing something. :) I.e. don't take my signoff as a need for less rigour.

soodoku · 2018-12-03T05:36:25Z

hey @arfon: go for it.

arfon · 2018-12-03T13:50:14Z

@masspastore - At this point could you make an archive of the reviewed software in Zenodo/figshare/other service and update this thread with the DOI of the archive? I can then move forward with accepting the submission.

masspastore · 2018-12-04T11:03:15Z

Thanks @arfon - Sure, just done; here is the link: https://zenodo.org/record/1920397#.XAZeVeLTU2x. Doi for Zenodo is 10.5281/zenodo.1920397

arfon · 2018-12-04T11:08:29Z

@whedon set 10.5281/zenodo.1920397 as archive

whedon · 2018-12-04T11:08:33Z

OK. 10.5281/zenodo.1920397 is the archive.

arfon · 2018-12-04T11:10:51Z

@whedon accept

whedon · 2018-12-04T11:10:54Z

Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...

whedon · 2018-12-04T11:11:24Z

PDF failed to compile for issue #1023 with the following error:

% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0
100 12 0 12 0 0 170 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 171
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-c44264c87f39/lib/whedon/bibtex.rb:43:in make_citation': undefined method has_field?' for #<BibTeX::Comment x-kbibtex-personnameformatting=<%l><, %f>> (NoMethodError)
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-c44264c87f39/lib/whedon/bibtex.rb:30:in block in generate_citations' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/bibtex-ruby-4.4.7/lib/bibtex/bibliography.rb:150:in each'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/bibtex-ruby-4.4.7/lib/bibtex/bibliography.rb:150:in each' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-c44264c87f39/lib/whedon/bibtex.rb:29:in generate_citations'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-c44264c87f39/lib/whedon/processor.rb:214:in generate_crossref' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-c44264c87f39/lib/whedon/processor.rb:91:in compile'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-c44264c87f39/bin/whedon:76:in compile' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in run'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in invoke_command' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor.rb:387:in dispatch'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in start' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-c44264c87f39/bin/whedon:113:in <top (required)>'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in load' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in

'

arfon · 2018-12-04T11:20:52Z

@whedon accept

arfon · 2018-12-04T11:21:54Z

@whedon accept

whedon · 2018-12-04T11:21:56Z

Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...

whedon · 2018-12-04T11:22:25Z

Check final proof 👉 openjournals/joss-papers#100

If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in openjournals/joss-papers#100, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true e.g.

@whedon accept deposit=true

arfon · 2018-12-04T11:25:57Z

Hi @masspastore - from a quick inspection, lots of the references in this article likely have DOIs. Could you add a doi field to the bibtex file where possible please?

For example, this paper has the DOI 10.1016/j.csda.2005.01.014

masspastore · 2018-12-05T10:01:33Z

Hi @arfon, I updated the bib file with all avaliable DOIs

Thanks

arfon · 2018-12-05T17:43:48Z

@whedon accept

whedon · 2018-12-05T17:43:51Z

Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...

whedon · 2018-12-05T17:44:49Z

Check final proof 👉 openjournals/joss-papers#105

If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in openjournals/joss-papers#105, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true e.g.

@whedon accept deposit=true

arfon · 2018-12-05T17:49:04Z

@whedon accept deposit=true

whedon · 2018-12-05T17:49:07Z

Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...

whedon · 2018-12-05T17:50:09Z

🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨

Here's what you must now do:

Check final PDF and Crossref metadata that was deposited 👉 Creating pull request for 10.21105.joss.01023 joss-papers#106
Wait a couple of minutes to verify that the paper DOI resolves https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01023
If everything looks good, then close this review issue.
Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘

Any issues? notify your editorial technical team...

arfon · 2018-12-05T17:51:59Z

@soodoku, @russellpierce - many thanks for your reviews here ✨

@masspastore - your paper is now accepted into JOSS ⚡🚀💥

whedon · 2018-12-05T17:52:02Z

🎉🎉🎉 Congratulations on your paper acceptance! 🎉🎉🎉

If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:

Markdown:
[![DOI](http://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01023/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01023)

HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01023">
  <img src="http://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01023/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>

reStructuredText:
.. image:: http://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01023/status.svg
   :target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01023

This is how it will look in your documentation:

We need your help!

Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:

Volunteering to review for us sometime in the future. You can add your name to the reviewer list here: http://joss.theoj.org/reviewer-signup.html
Making a small donation to support our running costs here: https://www.flipcause.com/secure/cause_pdetails/Mjk3Nzk=

whedon assigned leeper Oct 15, 2018

whedon added the review label Oct 15, 2018

whedon mentioned this issue Oct 15, 2018

[PRE REVIEW]: Overlapping: a R package for Estimating Overlapping in Empirical Distributions #844

Closed

russellpierce reopened this Nov 28, 2018

whedon added the accepted label Dec 5, 2018

arfon closed this as completed Dec 5, 2018

whedon added published Papers published in JOSS recommend-accept Papers recommended for acceptance in JOSS. labels Mar 2, 2020

[REVIEW]: Overlapping: a R package for Estimating Overlapping in Empirical Distributions #1023

[REVIEW]: Overlapping: a R package for Estimating Overlapping in Empirical Distributions #1023

Comments

whedon commented Oct 15, 2018 • edited

Status

Reviewer instructions & questions

Review checklist for @soodoku

Conflict of interest

Code of Conduct

General checks

Functionality

Documentation

Software paper

Review checklist for @russellpierce

Conflict of interest

Code of Conduct

General checks

Functionality

Documentation

Software paper

whedon commented Oct 15, 2018

whedon commented Oct 15, 2018

whedon commented Oct 15, 2018

arfon commented Oct 15, 2018

russellpierce commented Oct 15, 2018

masspastore commented Oct 25, 2018

whedon commented Oct 25, 2018

masspastore commented Oct 25, 2018

whedon commented Oct 25, 2018

whedon commented Oct 25, 2018

masspastore commented Oct 25, 2018

whedon commented Oct 25, 2018

whedon commented Oct 25, 2018

arfon commented Oct 25, 2018

masspastore commented Oct 26, 2018

ooo bot commented Oct 26, 2018

masspastore commented Oct 26, 2018

whedon commented Oct 26, 2018

whedon commented Oct 26, 2018

arfon commented Oct 26, 2018

masspastore commented Oct 27, 2018

masspastore commented Oct 27, 2018

ooo bot commented Oct 27, 2018

arfon commented Oct 27, 2018

arfon commented Oct 29, 2018

whedon commented Oct 29, 2018

whedon commented Oct 29, 2018

arfon commented Nov 29, 2018

soodoku commented Nov 29, 2018

russellpierce commented Nov 30, 2018

soodoku commented Dec 3, 2018

arfon commented Dec 3, 2018

masspastore commented Dec 4, 2018

arfon commented Dec 4, 2018

whedon commented Dec 4, 2018

arfon commented Dec 4, 2018

whedon commented Dec 4, 2018

whedon commented Dec 4, 2018

arfon commented Dec 4, 2018

arfon commented Dec 4, 2018

whedon commented Dec 4, 2018

whedon commented Dec 4, 2018

arfon commented Dec 4, 2018

masspastore commented Dec 5, 2018

arfon commented Dec 5, 2018

whedon commented Dec 5, 2018

whedon commented Dec 5, 2018

arfon commented Dec 5, 2018

whedon commented Dec 5, 2018

whedon commented Dec 5, 2018

arfon commented Dec 5, 2018

whedon commented Dec 5, 2018

whedon commented Oct 15, 2018 •

edited