Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: Bayesian X-ray Analysis (BXA) v4.0 #2984

Closed
whedon opened this issue Jan 24, 2021 · 26 comments
Closed

[PRE REVIEW]: Bayesian X-ray Analysis (BXA) v4.0 #2984

whedon opened this issue Jan 24, 2021 · 26 comments

Comments

@whedon
Copy link

whedon commented Jan 24, 2021

Submitting author: @JohannesBuchner (Johannes Buchner)
Repository: https://github.com/JohannesBuchner/BXA
Version: v4.0.2
Editor: @jgostick
Reviewers: @cescalara, @grburgessas, @cescalara
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @JohannesBuchner. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@JohannesBuchner if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 24, 2021

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 24, 2021

PDF failed to compile for issue #2984 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 24, 2021

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=8.34 s (10.7 files/s, 47060.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON                            12              0              0         383161
Python                          42           1052           1203           5275
reStructuredText                23            480            224            798
YAML                             2             13             18            208
make                             2             27              6             88
Bourne Shell                     6             24             13             56
XML                              1              9              0             20
Dockerfile                       1             11              1             14
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            89           1616           1465         389620
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '4ad1fad8b4c7dc2af0714b89' was
gathered on 2021/01/24.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Brian Refsdal                    8          3223            305           13.24
Johannes Buchner               143         16817           6303           86.75
Liu Teng                         1             1              1            0.01
ruizca                           1             1              1            0.01

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Brian Refsdal                 5            0.2        121.2               20.00
Johannes Buchner           7525           44.7         42.4               10.71
Liu Teng                      1          100.0          2.7                0.00

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-paper

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 24, 2021

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-paper. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 24, 2021

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon check references from branch joss-paper

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 24, 2021

Attempting to check references... from custom branch joss-paper

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 24, 2021

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1051/0004-6361/201322971 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14548.x is OK
- 10.1117/12.447161 is OK
- 10.1063/1.1835238 is OK
- 10.1086/339856 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@danielskatz
Copy link

👋 @jgostick - would you be able to edit this JOSS submission?

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon invite @jgostick as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 24, 2021

@jgostick has been invited to edit this submission.

@jgostick
Copy link

@whedon assign @jgostick as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 24, 2021

OK, the editor is @jgostick

@jgostick
Copy link

jgostick commented Feb 9, 2021

A have sent review invitations to several people and got no reply, so am send out a new batch of invites. Sorry for the delay. Suggested reviewers would be welcome.

@JohannesBuchner
Copy link

Here are some highly qualified people who know X-rays and statistics and software packaging, but I don't know if they can donate time to be reviewers: @dhuppenkothen @cescalara @giacomov @grburgess and perhaps stingray contributors.

@jgostick
Copy link

@whedon add @cescalara as reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Feb 18, 2021

OK, @cescalara is now a reviewer

@jgostick
Copy link

@whedon add @grburgessas reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Feb 18, 2021

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@whedon commands

@jgostick
Copy link

@whedon add @grburgessas as reviewer

@whedon whedon assigned jgostick and unassigned jgostick Feb 18, 2021
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Feb 18, 2021

OK, @grburgessas is now a reviewer

@jgostick
Copy link

@whedon add @cescalara as reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Feb 18, 2021

OK, @cescalara is now a reviewer

@jgostick
Copy link

@whedon start review

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Feb 18, 2021

OK, I've started the review over in #3045.

@whedon whedon closed this as completed Feb 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants