New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: scanstatistics: The R Package #416

Closed
whedon opened this Issue Sep 24, 2017 · 19 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
6 participants
@whedon
Collaborator

whedon commented Sep 24, 2017

Submitting author: @BenjaK (Benjamin Allévius)
Repository: https://github.com/BenjaK/scanstatistics
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @leeper
Reviewer: @pragyansmita

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @BenjaK. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@BenjaK if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

@whedon whedon added the pre-review label Sep 24, 2017

@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@whedon

whedon Sep 24, 2017

Collaborator

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands
Collaborator

whedon commented Sep 24, 2017

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands
@BenjaK

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@BenjaK

BenjaK Sep 25, 2017

Suggested reviewers:

BenjaK commented Sep 25, 2017

Suggested reviewers:

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Oct 2, 2017

Member

@robohyun66 Would you be interested in reviewing this for JOSS?

Member

leeper commented Oct 2, 2017

@robohyun66 Would you be interested in reviewing this for JOSS?

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Oct 2, 2017

Member

@whedon assign @leeper as editor

Member

leeper commented Oct 2, 2017

@whedon assign @leeper as editor

@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@whedon

whedon Oct 2, 2017

Collaborator

OK, the editor is @leeper

Collaborator

whedon commented Oct 2, 2017

OK, the editor is @leeper

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Oct 30, 2017

Member

@jsta Would you be interested in reviewing this?

Member

leeper commented Oct 30, 2017

@jsta Would you be interested in reviewing this?

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Nov 30, 2017

Member

I have thus far been unable to find a reviewer for this. @openjournals/joss-editors - anyone have suggestions or know of willing volunteers?

Member

leeper commented Nov 30, 2017

I have thus far been unable to find a reviewer for this. @openjournals/joss-editors - anyone have suggestions or know of willing volunteers?

@maelle

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@maelle

maelle Nov 30, 2017

Collaborator
Collaborator

maelle commented Nov 30, 2017

@arfon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arfon

arfon Dec 9, 2017

Member

@whedon commands

Member

arfon commented Dec 9, 2017

@whedon commands

@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@whedon

whedon Dec 9, 2017

Collaborator

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List all of Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# Assign a GitHub user as the reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor

# Set the software archive DOI at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set 10.0000/zenodo.00000 as archive

# Open the review issue
@whedon start review

🚧 🚧 🚧 Experimental Whedon features 🚧 🚧 🚧

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

Collaborator

whedon commented Dec 9, 2017

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List all of Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# Assign a GitHub user as the reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor

# Set the software archive DOI at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set 10.0000/zenodo.00000 as archive

# Open the review issue
@whedon start review

🚧 🚧 🚧 Experimental Whedon features 🚧 🚧 🚧

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

@arfon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arfon

arfon Dec 9, 2017

Member

@whedon list reviewers

Member

arfon commented Dec 9, 2017

@whedon list reviewers

@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@whedon

whedon Dec 9, 2017

Collaborator

Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers

Collaborator

whedon commented Dec 9, 2017

Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers

@arfon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arfon

arfon Dec 9, 2017

Member

@leeper - did you look through the people in https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers ?

Member

arfon commented Dec 9, 2017

@leeper - did you look through the people in https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers ?

@pragyansmita

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@pragyansmita

pragyansmita Dec 9, 2017

Collaborator

I can review this.

Collaborator

pragyansmita commented Dec 9, 2017

I can review this.

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Dec 18, 2017

Member

@pragyansmita Thank you so much! It's yours!!

Member

leeper commented Dec 18, 2017

@pragyansmita Thank you so much! It's yours!!

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Dec 18, 2017

Member

@whedon assign @pragyansmita as reviewer

Member

leeper commented Dec 18, 2017

@whedon assign @pragyansmita as reviewer

@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@whedon

whedon Dec 18, 2017

Collaborator

OK, the reviewer is @pragyansmita

Collaborator

whedon commented Dec 18, 2017

OK, the reviewer is @pragyansmita

@whedon whedon assigned leeper and pragyansmita and unassigned leeper Dec 18, 2017

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Dec 18, 2017

Member

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

Member

leeper commented Dec 18, 2017

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@whedon

whedon Dec 18, 2017

Collaborator

OK, I've started the review over in #515. Feel free to close this issue now!

Collaborator

whedon commented Dec 18, 2017

OK, I've started the review over in #515. Feel free to close this issue now!

@leeper leeper closed this Dec 18, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment